BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Rookie of the Year award

Rookie of the Year award

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
113462.6 in reply to 113462.5
Date: 9/27/2009 7:22:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Okay, let's say that rookies don't play that much so we cannot make the Rookie Of The Year Award. But we can edit a Manager Of The Year Award! This is what you meant by Coach Of The Year, wasn't it?

This Post:
00
113462.7 in reply to 113462.6
Date: 9/27/2009 8:07:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
No.

This Post:
00
113462.8 in reply to 113462.7
Date: 9/27/2009 9:35:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
I still think rookie of the year is still a good idea. Out of all the teams in the leagues, at least two of those teams are playing rookies especially if they are MVP and up.

This Post:
00
113462.9 in reply to 113462.8
Date: 9/27/2009 10:10:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I still think rookie of the year is still a good idea. Out of all the teams in the leagues, at least two of those teams are playing rookies especially if they are MVP and up.


what did it have to do with potential, especially for rookies there are nearly no differences betwenn the difference potentials.

And at least for my league, we don't have rookies with significant minutes in league, if we use then in league just in forfeiting situtions because of a hard cup game.

This Post:
00
113462.10 in reply to 113462.9
Date: 9/27/2009 10:17:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
Yes, but you still play the rookies. Your right potential doesn't make a difference, but if they are good, you are going to play them anyway. My point was that no matter how many minutes they play, they still play in the game.

This Post:
00
113462.11 in reply to 113462.10
Date: 9/27/2009 10:43:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
normally we buy them, after they become veterans ;)

The trend the last season goes to older trainees, and not the young guys.

From: Ozzy

This Post:
00
113462.12 in reply to 113462.5
Date: 9/27/2009 10:52:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
Coaches are the same for everyone, there is no point.

I mean coach like manager... like me :)

That can be some reward for someone who made the most with the weakest team :) Or someone who won everything...

From: rwystyrk

To: Ozzy
This Post:
00
113462.13 in reply to 113462.12
Date: 9/27/2009 11:14:58 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12031203
Second Team:
Jirkov
And how should algorithm works? In my eyes algorithms for MVP, for all star game voting are quite strange. I'm not sure, if it wouldn't be another meaningless trophy.

From: Ozzy

This Post:
00
113462.14 in reply to 113462.13
Date: 9/27/2009 12:11:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
MVP algorithm works perfectly! :)
And I'm very pleased with him...

When we talking about Coach of the year in some league (or Manager of the year) there is few ways to make that algorithm... One Idea can be that you make some predictions before season who team has the biggest potential, player ratings, budget, fans... and then just make algorithm to evaluate its seasonal achievements...

From: kLepTo

This Post:
00
113462.15 in reply to 113462.13
Date: 9/27/2009 12:37:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
102102
You can use the same algorithm as MVP but only consider rookies.

This Post:
00
113462.16 in reply to 113462.11
Date: 9/27/2009 12:52:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Define rookie. There are leagues with almost no human managers- There can be player trained effectively just through cups and scrimmages hitting the leagues for the first time after few such a seasons of training. There are other pretty much unpredictable cases which make such an award useless.

6th man awrds is even worse. Engine sometimes design someone as a starter but sub him even bafore the match starts (keeping the S symbol for strarter next to him as he technically is starter but he even may not enter the game at all).

Manager of the year? That one is a joke right? You cant measure that and it doesnt make sense to become a popualrity vote (as an avergae non top league manager wouldnt bother to vote).

Advertisement