BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Training

Training

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
117949.6 in reply to 117949.5
Date: 11/6/2009 11:01:17 AM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
545545
Thats wrong for 2 position training its more like 70% of 1 position training not 50%. Theres also a huge drop off if u don't get a player 48 minutes, don't know the exact percentage but if a player gets 47 minutes its more like 70 or 80% of full training. Someone might have a better % i'm just guessing.

This Post:
00
117949.7 in reply to 117949.1
Date: 11/6/2009 11:16:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i've been training pressure (PG/SG) for like 3 weeks with very little results. what the hell.

This Post:
00
117949.8 in reply to 117949.5
Date: 11/6/2009 11:24:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Oh well thx a lot for all the answers my friend
Hopefully the player I mentioned improved +1Ha +1DR & +1 JS !!!!!!!
I have to mention that he was 19 year old & my coach is level 4

This Post:
00
117949.9 in reply to 117949.7
Date: 11/6/2009 3:41:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
Train it single position, its much more effective that way

This Post:
00
117949.10 in reply to 117949.6
Date: 11/6/2009 5:17:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
"Thats wrong for 2 position training its more like 70% of 1 position training not 50%. Theres also a huge drop off if u don't get a player 48 minutes"

Your guessing just like me so how can you say i'm wrong and your correct i know what i said wasn't correct which is why i added that to my post, know one knows the answer so i don't really know why i bothered posting, good luck with your training.

This Post:
00
117949.11 in reply to 117949.10
Date: 11/6/2009 5:37:29 PM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
545545
Well the percentages might be a bit off but i am right that training drops off a lot when u don't get a player 48 minutes and that 2 position training trains more then 50% of 1 position training.

This Post:
00
117949.13 in reply to 117949.12
Date: 11/6/2009 7:38:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
"the second statement is definitely correct"

Okay prove it's correct then.(thanks)

This Post:
00
117949.14 in reply to 117949.12
Date: 11/6/2009 8:02:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Is it more than a 10% drop off for 47 min? If not I wouldn't use the ward huge to describe it.

This Post:
00
117949.15 in reply to 117949.14
Date: 11/6/2009 8:15:50 PM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
545545
Well my point was its not linear, so huge might not be the best term but its a significant difference

This Post:
00
117949.16 in reply to 117949.14
Date: 11/6/2009 8:17:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Well I can tell you it is definately NOT a linear relationship between minutes played and training. It is probably closer to an exponential relationship.

i.e. at 48 min you get 100% training but at 36 min this will go down to around 50% training.

You go figure...every minute below 48 min is a significant drop in training % though at 47 min you'll probably get close to full training i'd guess it'll be around 95% or so



Advertisement