BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > princeton?

princeton?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: zyler

This Post:
00
123691.6 in reply to 123691.5
Date: 12/18/2009 3:27:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
from the game i watched today where heat gave them a good flogging yes, yes it is lol.

princeton needs the 1,2,3,4 spots to be able to hit the 3 , with solid rebounding and inside game on 5.
2,3,4 spots also need inside game aswell as good driving skills.
as in all tactics all players need good passing.


This Post:
00
123691.7 in reply to 123691.6
Date: 12/18/2009 4:56:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
not too much 3 points...i bet my money for JS than JR for Princeton!

and i think a good PF with passing and JS is important too!

2,3 and 4 the most important with players with JS ...second comes JR

i insist that a very good PF will help much

PS : sorry my bad english!

This Post:
00
123691.8 in reply to 123691.7
Date: 12/18/2009 5:50:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
princeton is a 3pt shot or inside shot tactic, with very small amount of shots coming from mid range. so there will be 'much' 3point shots.
my understanding from what ive read is that js is always better then jr, though jr does help.
and you are correct your pf needs good passing and shooting, in somes your pf is basically another shooting sf but with better inside def.

Message deleted
From: JohnnyB
This Post:
00
123691.10 in reply to 123691.8
Date: 12/19/2009 12:48:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
I dont know any successful team that is using regularly the princenton. Maybe i can try it some times, but on the games that i cant lose.

This Post:
00
123691.11 in reply to 123691.10
Date: 12/19/2009 1:48:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
uh, princeton sucks. ok maybe i do not have the team to play it but i cant help. my last private league game was a total disaster. this tactic is way too slow, not even one single shot under 14 seconds, even in the last minute when i am down 5 points or so. the ratings looks quite fine, but the performance was not. i am going to ignore it unless they review and change it.

Last edited by left hand path at 12/19/2009 1:49:30 AM