BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Enthousiam issue?

Enthousiam issue?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
125231.6 in reply to 125231.5
Date: 12/27/2009 4:56:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
I can count. I am not sure they're 100% exact but I think it is quite near the real value.

Edit: if the person(s) who rated the post with one ball wants to see how I came to such precise numbers, I can provide him (them) with the whole calculation

Last edited by PunkFloid at 12/27/2009 1:28:03 PM

This Post:
00
125231.7 in reply to 125231.6
Date: 12/29/2009 7:23:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I think Mark's point was that anything related to how enthusiasm drops is more or less a(n educated) guess at this point.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 12/29/2009 7:23:49 AM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
125231.8 in reply to 125231.7
Date: 12/29/2009 12:31:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2626
It still be at 8 level today... it seems to be like the area estimation days :-D

Still strange for me... But I m happy now to be at 8 level since saturday ^^

It was just a wrong enthousiasm evaluation, I guess

Thanks all

So a local Bug ;-)

This Post:
00
125231.9 in reply to 125231.7
Date: 12/29/2009 12:43:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
I dont know what you mean by that. I know enthusiasm formula is more complex and it is not that easy to figure the real numbers out, but in my calculaction anything less than 10 fits perfectly and I dont see a reason why I could not share the outcome as I reckon it is a pretty good one.

Last edited by PunkFloid at 12/29/2009 12:43:57 PM

This Post:
00
125231.10 in reply to 125231.9
Date: 12/29/2009 2:38:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I dont know what you mean by that. I know enthusiasm formula is more complex and it is not that easy to figure the real numbers out, but in my calculaction anything less than 10 fits perfectly and I dont see a reason why I could not share the outcome as I reckon it is a pretty good one.

I wouldn't be confident in anything that claims to predict enthusiasm level to the hundredth, but that's just me.

Either way, unless you share the actual reasoning behind those numbers, you'll be open for criticism for pulling numbers out of thin air.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 12/29/2009 2:39:20 PM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
125231.11 in reply to 125231.10
Date: 12/29/2009 3:26:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
I wouldn't be confident in anything that claims to predict enthusiasm level to the hundredth, but that's just me.


As I said - those numbers dont have to be 100% precise - and I add that it is highly plausible they are not. Or at least not the hunderths.

Either way, unless you share the actual reasoning behind those numbers, you'll be open for criticism for pulling numbers out of thin air.


If someone wants to criticise I don't care at all. Unless anybody asks me to do so, I will not share anything. I said I would provide anybody with the way I came to such numbers and that is still true. But I think "the way" is not important at all as the numbers are in public now and anybody can go find a logical relationship between them.

From: PunkFloid

To: OoB
This Post:
00
125231.12 in reply to 125231.8
Date: 12/29/2009 3:30:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
In my calculations it should be exactly like that. It hasnt dropped below 7,5 since Saturday and that's why it shows you level 8.

This Post:
00
125231.13 in reply to 125231.11
Date: 12/29/2009 4:41:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
If someone wants to criticise I don't care at all. Unless anybody asks me to do so, I will not share anything. I said I would provide anybody with the way I came to such numbers and that is still true. But I think "the way" is not important at all as the numbers are in public now and anybody can go find a logical relationship between them..

We can't criticize something we don't know. Your logic might as well be accurate, but since it's not open for scrutiny, we can't know (you can tell I like the scientific method).

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
125231.14 in reply to 125231.13
Date: 12/29/2009 4:47:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
We can't criticize something we don't know.


If you dont know, you just dont want to know as the numbers are public and are open for scrutiny! It will take you 10 minutes to puzzle out "my formula".

One way or another my point was not to reveal the numbers right now but to assure the user that his enthusiasm level shown is completely perfect and thus I quit this discussion right now.



Last edited by PunkFloid at 12/29/2009 4:47:20 PM

This Post:
00
125231.15 in reply to 125231.14
Date: 12/29/2009 4:49:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Jeez, calm down, we're not asking for the secret of life here.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
125231.16 in reply to 125231.15
Date: 12/29/2009 4:55:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
Is that because you know I wouldn't tell it either?

Sorry, just a silly joke.

If everything goes just well, the numbers will be ready in 2 weeks time I suppose. I just dont want to make public something that is not completely accurate by now. It might never be but I want to make sure it is as good as my maths skills can do that.

Advertisement