BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > AllStar Private League

AllStar Private League

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
142936.6 in reply to 142936.4
Date: 5/5/2010 1:09:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
No worries, I like the solution you offered. Allowing teams to offer up specific players only to the alliance is a good way to go and minimizes the risk of someone exposing your entire teams stats. Just out of curiousity, will all members within an alliance be able to see the stats of all the players that are chosen to be on the alliance team? I think they should be able to otherwise it would be a little boring and everyone would prefer to be the leader of the alliance.

Then there could be an Alliance competition, where the top 1024 Alliance teams around the world battle it out on Friday nights to see which collection of superstars are the best. Kind of like a world cup with superstar teams but for supporters only. And then the winner could get a trophy or something.

This Post:
00
142936.7 in reply to 142936.2
Date: 5/5/2010 1:30:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
That's a great idea!!! I have a group of friends and I want to put in my best player along with theirs to see how our team would match against other groups. I don't think this is restricted to just one nation, hopefully we can match up against any group around the world.

Last edited by datzilla at 5/5/2010 1:37:08 AM

Yo! Yo! D for D best PF in D Aussie BB. D Name is Kye Duffill (10080211), averages nothing but pure amazing! Vote for Duffman!
This Post:
00
142936.8 in reply to 142936.6
Date: 5/5/2010 1:37:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
179179
Yeah to keep it fair, I think all members in the alliance should be able to see stats of all players on the Alliance Roster.
And of course, I see the leader of the alliance as being the facilitator of the process - i would presume to say that alliances should be ruled by democracy (which is why I suggest a private forum for each alliance to discuss tactics, lineups, etc)

I love the way you're thinking! I thought exactly the same thing, having a "Tournament" style of the top alliance teams to duke it out, with a trophy as a reward. Didn't want to suggest it in my original post to avoid clutter, but definitely a very cool feature!

Baby steps though.... baby steps... :)

C;mon BB's read this and say you'll do it! :) Or at least think about it! :D


Last edited by akuma at 5/5/2010 1:38:43 AM

From: datzilla

This Post:
00
142936.9 in reply to 142936.8
Date: 5/5/2010 1:42:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
should there be a limit on the size of an alliance? How do we keep fairness so that alliance size doesn't reflect to team strength & performance?

Last edited by datzilla at 5/5/2010 1:44:23 AM

Yo! Yo! D for D best PF in D Aussie BB. D Name is Kye Duffill (10080211), averages nothing but pure amazing! Vote for Duffman!
From: akuma

This Post:
00
142936.10 in reply to 142936.9
Date: 5/5/2010 1:46:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
179179
Yeah man I would say there should be a cap of how many teams are in an alliance.

8 sounds like a good number?
Of course, it doesnt necessarily have to be 8, just up to 8

This Post:
00
142936.11 in reply to 142936.10
Date: 5/5/2010 1:59:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I like an 8 team cap. To make more alliance teams that are more similarly skilled you could make it a 5 team max though.

This Post:
00
142936.12 in reply to 142936.1
Date: 5/5/2010 2:53:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6868
I love the idea, but i think it has to be the same as the National Teams where only the leader can see the players stats. there is no need for the other members to see the stats. It will only create problems and arguments when people give away your players stats to other users.

This Post:
00
142936.13 in reply to 142936.12
Date: 5/5/2010 4:50:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
179179
True, it could be subject for abuse, especially for teams where players don't know each other too well.

I guess for alliances where trust and abuse is less of an issue, they could use the private forum to post up specific players stats, etc. to allow for more information sharing.

I would see a successful alliance is one where all players contribute in terms of training, gameshape, scouting, and strategy. I was hesitant in my original idea to put too much power into the leaders hands - rather it would be ideal to have all the players involved - but you are right it would be too open to abuse.

I like how all this is fleshing out. Thanks for your contribution guys. Dunno if a lot of people read the suggestion forums, but if you like the idea, spread the word to your mates!

Maybe if we get enough support behind it, it might be a go-er!

This Post:
00
142936.14 in reply to 142936.13
Date: 5/5/2010 5:11:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
Anything that would allow smeltz, rooney, duff duff etc to play together is a great idea !

"the labor party cant even spell surplus, let alone deliver one"
This Post:
00
142936.15 in reply to 142936.12
Date: 5/5/2010 10:22:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I don't agree sorry. I understand why you think that only the leader should be able to see the stats, but I think it makes the suggestion a lot less fun. I think it is vital to be able to see the stats of all the players selected to be on the team so that the teams involved in the alliance can comment on what tactics to play etc. If I join an alliance and the only thing I can see is my guy's stats and I can't comment on what tactics to play because I can't see other players stats, then there is no real point. Everyone would just want to be the leader.

This Post:
00
142936.16 in reply to 142936.9
Date: 5/6/2010 1:11:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Make it a 10 team limit with only 1 player per team allowed to be dressed for the match. This way no-one team dominates and everyone in the alliance feels like they are contributing to the success/failure of the team.

Great Idea!

Advertisement