BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Things to do better

Things to do better

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
165259.6 in reply to 165259.1
Date: 11/30/2010 5:24:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Should be a MVP in the All-Star, and the team should get money for it.

Give a money reward por things like: ''Winer of the ''triples'' show ( 3 points score ), most score player on the league, mvp of all-star, mvp playoff... )


When these games are played in arcade mode and with no proper selection process (i.e the all star voting seems more random than ensuring the best player makes the team), you can not give financial rewards to teams. It is justly unfair for teams that don't have players on the all star team for no fault of their own than for a crappy all star voting process.

This Post:
00
165259.7 in reply to 165259.6
Date: 12/1/2010 5:31:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
210210
You can also catch and make your contribution a player on your team by position.

And in your list of voting to choose a position player for each of the co-conference (of which they have submitted).

Whoever takes the most votes by position goes to allstar.

This Post:
00
165259.8 in reply to 165259.7
Date: 12/5/2010 10:06:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
I understand what are u trying to say about the private leagues, but could be posible to find a way for both players to be ok, the sponsors and the not sponsors, but, because the sponsor pay, it should be a little advantage for them.

About the votations, i think that it's quite correct and just process votation for the best player, and yes, i think that having a good player, dosn't matter a all-star, winner of concurse of ''triples'' ( 3 points score ) or the most score player of the league, must win a money reward or level up, because the reality, when u win a reward, u start to trust more on yourself and play better.

good luck to everyone ^^

This Post:
00
165259.9 in reply to 165259.8
Date: 12/7/2010 7:32:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
534534
I think you supporters don´t realice the advantage that playing in a private league is. I don´t use to play with my best team in league because i have to train and to take care about minutes played and game shape. To test your best team once a week is a realy good advantage, cause it lets you go to play off knowing wich players work better toguether and with wich tactic they play better. I am tired of people asking for more things for supporters and not taking advantages of what they have. The rest of proposals are ok... well, I don´t think two simultaneos trainings are a good idea either.

This Post:
00
165259.10 in reply to 165259.9
Date: 12/8/2010 3:11:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Private leagues can be an added convenience and can make things easier, but they do not provide an in-game advantage. So they are no different than any other Supporter feature.

This Post:
00
165259.11 in reply to 165259.10
Date: 12/8/2010 4:16:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
534534
I agree, they don´t provide an
in-game advantage
but playing in your private league makes testing your PO team much more easy. I don´t think it is unfair, paying must have some advantage and improving your "game experience" it is a sutil advantage that can be very helpfull. I wast critizising th people that continiusly ask for mor options for supporters and don´t realice they have a very usefull diference with the non-supporters, the private league.

This Post:
00
165259.12 in reply to 165259.11
Date: 12/8/2010 4:37:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
That's the point of the Supporter package. It makes functions of BB easier, but doesn't provide advantages to be used in a game.

For example, Supporters can be alerted via e-mail or text five minutes before a TL auction is about to end - but non-supporters can set an alarm on their phone manually.

The line is drawn clearly and perfectly, and I see no reason why Supporters shouldn't suggest more features, if they do in fact make the package more enticing. Any suggestion by a Supporter looking for an in-game advantage in the Support package will not be implemented. Why are you concerned?

This Post:
00
165259.13 in reply to 165259.1
Date: 12/11/2010 11:41:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Interesting, but adding the "two kinds of training" thing would be terrible, because then I'd just have a team FULL of trainees, and just train everybody at once.