BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Income should reflect the league competitiveness

Income should reflect the league competitiveness

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
206173.6 in reply to 206173.2
Date: 1/10/2012 5:01:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
If there are very few users in that nations with real value, than they will suffer.
It could be suggested to make "unions" for those several BB-nations until they will get bigger. Like the UK includes on some sports Wales, etc. [Am I right?]

It is much more reasonable that those realy rare cases, when there are very few teams that worth something will suffer from that, than the other way around - the all other will suffer from those miniature BB-nation.

When the quality on the highest division is so low, the only strong team (or the few strong teams), can focus on the B3, can by low quality and cheap playres for few seasons, and still get the title (or close to that), and then make a big stand on B3, due to the fact that they saved that enormous amount of money due to that fact.

BTW - Israel is not a big BB-nation.

This Post:
00
206173.7 in reply to 206173.6
Date: 1/10/2012 5:08:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
And this is bad or good? Actually there´s some now blood in the competition, right? And by forming unions, you´d protect the old, long-term teams, wouldn´t you?

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
206173.8 in reply to 206173.3
Date: 1/10/2012 5:11:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
I did not see any definition on BB "manual" about the relation of TV money and the average salary (throughou tht season) of teams at that division.

The only thing that is stated is that the lower cap is defined upon the TV money and the division.
Meaning - the other way around, and not relevant.

The TV money (for example) needs to be calculated upon each week average salary (on that week) throughout the division (or conference).

This Post:
00
206173.9 in reply to 206173.4
Date: 1/10/2012 5:12:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Don't you think that you need to state that your BB-nation is just about 240 users?

This Post:
00
206173.10 in reply to 206173.8
Date: 1/10/2012 5:13:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
No it doesn´t need to.

TV money is calculated by the strength of the league / players. As player skills and player salaries are more or less directly connected (other than let´s say in the NBA, where the salary is based on plenty things but not just on ACTUAL skill), and because salaries are independet of the league level, the league strength -> TV contract -> salaries are all "in some way" connected with each other.

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
206173.11 in reply to 206173.7
Date: 1/10/2012 5:15:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
And this is bad or good? Actually there´s some now blood in the competition, right? And by forming unions, you´d protect the old, long-term teams, wouldn´t you?
What????!?!?
A union of several small nation that will compete will just make them like a regular size BB-nation. not anything else.
It may affect (for good) the competitiveness of those countries.

This Post:
11
206173.12 in reply to 206173.3
Date: 1/10/2012 5:45:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
What is the actual suggestion?

Today he had no idea how to create new suggestion so he "created" thing which is implemented from many seasons ;-)

This Post:
00
206173.13 in reply to 206173.8
Date: 1/11/2012 1:58:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
Meaning - the other way around, and not relevant.

How the salary floor is calculated is a separate issue.

The TV money (for example) needs to be calculated upon each week average salary (on that week) throughout the division (or conference).

The TV income is not calculated weekly, it is per season based on the strength of the league. The TV income among div I leagues around the world differ quite a lot. The fluctuation is smaller across div II leagues in a single nation, but the money is not the same for everyone.

This Post:
00
206173.15 in reply to 206173.13
Date: 1/11/2012 4:25:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
The TV income is not calculated weekly, it is per season based on the strength of the league. The TV income among div I leagues around the world differ quite a lot. The fluctuation is smaller across div II leagues in a single nation, but the money is not the same for everyone.
OK, so the only thing that is needed to be changed in that case is to calculate it weekly, due to the huge fluctuation on salaries during a season.

What you did not say, is how this calculation is computed. On which parameters?
If it is on the average salaries on that division, than this is what should be.

This Post:
00
206173.16 in reply to 206173.15
Date: 1/11/2012 5:41:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
the bb didn't realised the formula, and at least the huge fluctuation in salarys isn't the case in my league that quite constant ;) There are cross effect betwen the same division level betwen the countrys, which should make the salary even more stable through the bigger amount of teams.(there are just slight differences betwen different third division in one country)

But maybe they let influence it by averages, over the last season i wouldn't be surprised at least.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 1/11/2012 5:43:04 PM

Advertisement