BuzzerBeater Forums

3) Preferring local NT coach on a tie election;
In case that there are several users with the same number of votes, and one of those candidates is a local user, he will get the NT coaching position.

So even if the local user has 10 days or 1 month in the game he will get the NT position instead of a foreign user who has 1000 days in the game?

Some will prefer having locals, while others will prefer having a more experienced one.
Another option is setting a minimum experience limitation to all of the points I've brought at the head of this thread.

Of course i don't agree with this and i like better the current system in such cases!

Because now a newbie cannot be voted for the next NT coach??? As you know (??) this is not true.

3) Preferring local NT coach on a tie election;
In case that there are several users with the same number of votes, and one of those candidates is a local user, he will get the NT coaching position.

So even if the local user has 10 days or 1 month in the game he will get the NT position instead of a foreign user who has 1000 days in the game?
Of course i don't agree with this and i like better the current system in such cases!

And, he also has got 1 vote more, as he can not vote for himself.

You are totally wrong, and totally right at the same comment...

You are right - currently, a foreign user cannot set a vote for himself, while the local newbie can.
On my suggestion, the foreign has a automatic one vote. His own vote.

And you are wrong, as you claimed the opposite - that my suggestion prefers (more than current system) the local user even if he has less experience than the foreign one.

And again, the experience issue is another point that can be addressed directly, and I've done that on my previous message here (not at the main message), and as nothing to do with the main message.

Some will prefer having locals, while others will prefer having a more experienced one.

I don't think so that someone want a 10 days player as his NT!Such a player don't know the basics for the game!

You can read the link that I've brought at the main message.
There you will find that the user who wrote that prefers a local coach over a foreign one.

Again, I've addressed the experience issue on another message anyhow.

Because now a newbie cannot be voted for the next NT coach??? As you know (??) this is not true.

I'm not saying that!
But with the current system as you know (????) in a tie election the older player will get the the NT coaching position and i think that is more fair than to set this only by the nationality without considering how long the local candidate is in the game!

But that foreign user will have one less vote on current system.........!

And still, having a coach is better than not having one...
It is not that currently a foreign user cannot put himself as candidate for an NT position.

This is not because there has not been candidates, but because all the candidates disappeared. The problem of lack of NT coach could be managed if there is mid-term election, but this is upon the BB and not anyone of us. We cannot know if this easy to launch or not and we cannot state it is.

????
Which user will coach a NT that no one had set his name as a candidate?
NONE!!!

you could register for an election, and still voting for other with a reason(maybe to get one of the random votes, or beeing the backup candidate)

And still, having a coach is better than not having one...
It is not that currently a foreign user cannot put himself as candidate for an NT position.

there is normally not a lack of candidates, at least till now

Some will prefer having locals, while others will prefer having a more experienced one.
Another option is setting a minimum experience limitation to all of the points I've brought at the head of this thread.

there are user in theire 5th season, who know few about the absic of the games and there are new users who learn fast and put effort in it and a quite good after a month(and people who played in the past). An border that you need to play at least X season, won't help.

And still, having a coach is better than not having one...
It is not that currently a foreign user cannot put himself as candidate for an NT position.

This is not because there has not been candidates, but because all the candidates disappeared. The problem of lack of NT coach could be managed if there is mid-term election, but this is upon the BB and not anyone of us. We cannot know if this easy to launch or not and we cannot state it is.

????
Which user will coach a NT that no one had set his name as a candidate?
NONE!!!

There has always been candidates. Please, look the facts before bolding, capslocking and underlining something.

Maybe they where, and maybe there weren't, what is a sure thing that it is a possibility that grows as the number of possible candidates get smaller, which is what happens comparing to when the option for being a NT coach get publicized.

All quoting are from CrazyEye. I set it to "Everybody" as it has an answer also for Nickleon;

you could register for an election, and still voting for other with a reason(maybe to get one of the random votes, or beeing the backup candidate)

What???? Why a candidate will set himself as a candidate and vote for another?
It never happens at any world.

And still, having a coach is better than not having one...
It is not that currently a foreign user cannot put himself as candidate for an NT position.

there is normally not a lack of candidates, at least till now

And it still can happen. And the likelihood is getting lower when the possibility for more users setting themselves as candidates is being pushed up.

Some will prefer having locals, while others will prefer having a more experienced one.
Another option is setting a minimum experience limitation to all of the points I've brought at the head of this thread.

there are user in theire 5th season, who know few about the absic of the games and there are new users who learn fast and put effort in it and a quite good after a month(and people who played in the past). An border that you need to play at least X season, won't help.

And here Nickleon you have another example of someone who doesn't like having a limit upon experience. Thank you CrazyEye for your assistance here. :+)
Anyhow, for your (CrazyEye) claim here, it is an option.
As said, some would find it a good limitation (like Nickleon), and some wouldn't.
I think that this limitation (point (5) on my header message) is a good one, and it is more likely that an old user will have more experience and will be better.
In any case, there is a very low chance that someone will vote for a new user.

And again, that point is debatable, and can be separated from all the other points (mini-suggestion) on the header message.