BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Market

Market

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
263000.6 in reply to 263000.3
Date: 10/1/2014 11:10:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
He means automatical retirements, when the team goes bot.

I don't know if 19k sf would retire though.. I think it's 25k for centers, and less for other positions.



It's 25k for PG-SG, 20k for SF, 30k for PF and 35k for C. Too high parameters in my opinion. All i'm saying is, as I said before, that this rule had sense in the past, now it's obsolete.

This Post:
00
263000.7 in reply to 263000.6
Date: 10/1/2014 2:06:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
I agree with you, it should probably be lowered or even removed, only BBs could gather some numbers and statistics.

And if they remove blank lineups there will be a lot of demand for those low salary players soon.

From: Quigley
This Post:
00
263000.9 in reply to 263000.8
Date: 10/1/2014 10:17:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
I'm all for at the very least some sort of an adjustment to those minimum salaries. This would really help teams in lower divisions pick up cheap talent, which in turn would make those divisions more competitive. If the minimum salary was extremely low, or gone entirely, we'd also benefit from those $3,000 salary 19 year olds who've done nothing but train one skill while the old manager was away. Those players are very beneficial when you're looking for someone to add to your extended periods of 1v1/JS training. Most players have value to somebody, even ones from retired teams.