BuzzerBeater Forums

From what I`ve seen quite a lot of teams use it. It was used in the final game last season as well.

Holy Mother of All Things Good in this World!

I was following along in the Princeton thread and wishing there was something like for the other tactics. I've started to give Princeton a try based off those stats and currently going to try out Inside ISO tonight in my CUP.

I hope you continue the discussion in this thread. Looking forward to hearing everyone's thoughts. I had heard that Inside ISO ends up taking a good number of threes because of kickouts. My first look at these findings was to confirm that Inside ISO does indeed have a good share of the attempts being from beyond the arc, but surprisingly it's got a low rate of assisted attempts.

I'll have to review the other offenses to see how it really compares still, but it was surprising nonetheless.

Do you by chance happen to have the defense these offenses faced?

May I ask what language you are using to scrape the BBAPI? I've been working on building something using Python to scrape the data from BBAPI but it's in the early stages of design, such as logging in, getting the basic Team Info and throwing it into a dictionary.

Before I go any further, I need to sit down and map out what I want to achieve with the data and then start planning the functions from that point forward.

Anyways, I don't want to hijack your thread and it's purpose so I'll leave that for a discussion later.

First of all thanks the author for this massive information, great work.
I have a question though. Anybody any idea how in this game PPP of my C is less than my opponents'??
http://digitalfieldtheory.com/match/101858254/boxscore.aspx
His centers went 1-5 FG 1-1 FT (Starting center 0 points in 36mins) total of 3 Pts and my Centers were 5-10FG 1-4 Ft - 11 points in total. Still, PPP for my C was 111 compared to my opponents 112,4. Very strange.

Last edited by Nicolas at 4/19/2018 1:50:30 AM

great job!

it seems base tactic is the one which provides the highet % of TS%. correct?