I disagreed with the salary increase thing when you first proposed it and I still don't like it. It means that I constantly will need to be looking for a new coach to maximize my team's economy. In other words, I will have to devote more time playing the game. I will have to figure out the optimal time to change coaches and the optimal price.
The old system is not very interesting but at least it was easier to understand when to make changes.
Wouldn't it be better to have your coach become a free agent at a fixed date after you sign him? Then at least I know when I will have to replace the coach.
Also, I would much rather bid on the weekly salary of the coach rather than a huge "bonus" that goes nowhere. Either that or take away the salary of the coach altogether.
Finally, I don't get the relation to the real world. The coach's skill is not improving but he gets constant salary increases which are more than inflation?
Last edited by HeadPaperPusher at 10/11/2008 5:58:20 PM
Run of the Mill Canadian Manager