BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Crunch time vs Take it easy

Crunch time vs Take it easy

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
54231.6 in reply to 54231.3
Date: 10/19/2008 9:20:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
(6383282)

I think this match is a bug. It has to be a bug.
I suspect a problem in matches where there are two levels of attitude difference.

I just see a game where the team with the worse points per 100 shots numbers lost. Which is logical. Is there anything else we're supposed to be looking at?

ahhhhh ok, so the team ratings and CT are useless..sorry, I didn't know this news, I think that BBstaff should be write it in the main page or in the rules..:)

PS however, I don't think it's a bug, but we have to tell the truth: Frency was very unlucky and we can't assume that the result of the match is right..



Last edited by mr_burns (goodbye BB!) at 10/19/2008 9:23:41 AM

This Post:
00
54231.7 in reply to 54231.6
Date: 10/19/2008 9:48:44 AM
Cruesli
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
530530
Second Team:
The Milk
He was unlucky. But there is more than match ratings, shots and CT.

I guess frency would often win this match as well, but the PF and C of constantinopel are great players and might very well have extremely good defensive stats which makes frency's inside tactic a lot weaker. Frency had to rely on his SG and Sf for the points while playing inside....whcih can work but may not.

Crunchy! If you eat fast enough
From: frency90

This Post:
00
54231.8 in reply to 54231.7
Date: 10/19/2008 9:52:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
He was unlucky. But there is more than match ratings, shots and CT.

I guess frency would often win this match as well, but the PF and C of constantinopel are great players and might very well have extremely good defensive stats which makes frency's inside tactic a lot weaker. Frency had to rely on his SG and Sf for the points while playing inside....whcih can work but may not.


Ok, but why if costantinopoli had better defenders, I had best ratings?

From: Tesse

This Post:
00
54231.9 in reply to 54231.8
Date: 10/19/2008 9:58:25 AM
Cruesli
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
530530
Second Team:
The Milk
For one because he played MTM and you 2-3 zone.

But I guess it might be so that his SF, SG and PG are less able in ID and just his C and PF have very good ID.

This would make his total defense rating less impressive than yours but would still handicap your PF and C in the one on one matches during the game.

As I said you might very well win this game, but it is also possibl to lose it. I myself have lost matches where I had better ratings and CT, but where the other guy just had fitting player abilities tht were not so much visible in the stats.

Crunchy! If you eat fast enough
This Post:
00
54231.12 in reply to 54231.10
Date: 10/19/2008 10:46:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
(6383282)

I think this match is a bug. It has to be a bug.
I suspect a problem in matches where there are two levels of attitude difference.

I just see a game where the team with the worse points per 100 shots numbers lost. Which is logical. Is there anything else we're supposed to be looking at?


I just see a game where the team with the best team ratings, and the only team who tried, lost. Which is illogical.

That's something wrong, also because the team ratings and the points per 100 shots speak about two different matches.


Team ratings might give you an idea about how strong a team is, but they are not foolproof. Likewise, CT with very low enthusiasm is not much better than a Normal.


enthusiasm 8 is very low??!

that's really a news!

This Post:
00
54231.14 in reply to 54231.13
Date: 10/19/2008 12:39:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
Again, points per 100 possessions is strictly what determines the game outcome.

Do not forget Reb, FT (fouls), TO and BLK.

This Post:
00
54231.16 in reply to 54231.13
Date: 10/19/2008 1:00:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
enthusiasm 8 is very low??!

I'm pointing out possible reasons, not delivering judgment about what the enthusiasm actually was.

Again, points per 100 possessions is strictly what determines the game outcome. If they were identical to team ratings, then it wouldn't make sense to have both of them.

It is obviously not up to me to decide whether there was a bug or not. But 'there must be a bug' is not necessarily the only explanation for the situation.


There must be a bug was only a provocation..

anyway, point per 100 shots can't explain 60 rebounds against 40, while my ratings were better and while the BBs said that rebounds are influenced by attitude!

Advertisement