BuzzerBeater Forums

first off. It is not a 'problem' as is stated in the initial post! It is important to understand that. problems need to be fixed. This is open for discussion.

I can understand it is annoying, and I will never 'arange'a mutual TIE, but I do like to be able to manage my enthousiasm as I like it, and I also HATE it when the CT against me to win, because you can see it happen from a mile away what the result is: Win agains tme, loose next two games. The only ones who gain are the teams playing my opponent after me. But it is not because I don't like it that it is a problem to the game.

if TIE must be punished when you loose, then I say you must get punished the next 2 or 3 games you loose after a CT as well, since you know very well you are likely to loose those if you CT to get a win. Looks just the same to me.

It's all in management and how everyone sets his priorities.

Don't forget, teams that arange mutual TIEs will not gain advantage in the end, since they give up on the strenght of it and 'share' it with their opponents. In the end their enthousiasm will not be higher then any of the others they arranged it with, so what's the advantage?

I can understand it is annoying, ... , but I do like to be able to manage my enthousiasm as I like it.

sign, for me playing tie is an important tactical instrument. And when you say, that he loose games in playing tie and not giving your best, then i say you loose more games if you don't play Tie from time to time, and are not giving your best and your fans should run away.

When you always want that the team give their best, you have to change the gameshape system and delete motivation out of this game - but i pretty sure the game is less fun after it.

Don't forget, teams that arange mutual TIEs will not gain advantage in the end, since they give up on the strenght of it and 'share' it with their opponents. In the end their enthousiasm will not be higher then any of the others they arranged it with, so what's the advantage?

This is nobel prize winning post ;) Sorry with an tie agreement you profitate without having an disadvantage of it, your only disadvantage was that your opponent don't have to TIE ... Ok when you think at the best of three series in the PO you might be right^^

Please, TIE Agreements are an abomination.

Honestly, I don't know how often they occur, but to me, its not much different than getting a friend to overbid on a player or play his 2nd team against you or something like that.

Steve
Bruins

let me clearly restate that I will never have such an 'arangement' myself.

Let me also state that I am not in favor.

but that is about anything I can say about it. It is not, and will not be forbidden.

overbidding is clearly against the rules, so I honestly cannot see why you would make a comparison like this.

On the other hand, we are again starting a discussion about something that was already discussed, and for which there is an other threat.

The other thing that was stated, that teams should not trow a game they can not win anyway is something new.
I myself trew my last B3 game last season to gain enthousiasm from the TIE I played at it. Anyone sane and smart enough to just know they stand no chance, and use the unluckyness of the situation to at least get something out of it, should be punished? I didn't think so!

therefor, a NO-NO on this suggestion if I could decide.

the solution to a TIE agreement is...accept it and after you're setting normal
:D

The TIE Agreement issue is an important one, up there with malaria in Africa and the Global Warming.

To continue a very poignant discussion on one of the biggest problems our country faces today, click here:
(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/BBWeb/Forum/read.aspx?thread=...)


Last edited by stogey23 at 12/15/2008 1:25:00 PM

you could links threads diretly, or at least start with the link with /bbWeb/ because then all user could follow the link.

You could figure it out and post it for him.

Like so: (35222.1)

he should learn from it, and it was easier for me to ask again ...

Instead of copying the link, pasting him in a txt , looking for thread id and put it in again here.

Like adomole, I'm a team whose opponents often TIE and/or play their second teams. I generally TIE against those teams as well, since I know I'm probably going to win even if they try their hardest.
​
If your change was implemented, I'd still win and I'd still TIE. No difference. But the weaker teams would either have their income or their enthusiasm punished.
​
So, this would build in an advantage for the stronger teams. I don't think that's a good idea.

What he said.

On second teams -since trainng needs minutes and game shape is more or less influenced by minutes played I don't see why anyone shouldn't play any players he/she wants.

Why punish yourself twice?!