BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Make smaller breaks between games

Make smaller breaks between games

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
67122.7 in reply to 67122.6
Date: 1/4/2009 2:51:36 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
hmm... i will have to think about this one... might be a good idea.. but i need to work it out on paper and make sure it keeps everyone busy... as you correctly point out having teams wait around is not a good idea.. and generally we find we are losing people at the end of the season when the playoffs are happening as it is.. presumably because they are out of contention and have lost interest... though at the start of the season we seem to do really well and everyone is immediately optimistic again... so our thought is to get the playoffs over with as quickly as possible to keep the most people happy and intrigued with the game.

This Post:
00
67122.10 in reply to 67122.9
Date: 1/4/2009 3:49:54 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
but I guess that could be solved by slashing the salaries to 50% for teams placed 5th and 8th (the only ones not to get extra money).


oh sure.. good luck getting that passed the players union ;)

This Post:
00
67122.13 in reply to 67122.9
Date: 1/4/2009 4:02:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i believe easy was good, and 50% is nothing against an home game ... I would say around 150% was more the amount you should look for^^

This Post:
00
67122.16 in reply to 67122.15
Date: 1/4/2009 4:10:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
mhh the price of PO was even more ;)

Hey and they could be sorry for beeing that unsuccesful my player, because else it will be ecomical to play relegation, instead of finishing fifth. So why punish the guy who finish fifth, wwhen it was so easy to win the relegation and get more money and a better draft pick.

Advertisement