BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Offensive Fouls

Offensive Fouls

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
97423.6 in reply to 97423.5
Date: 6/17/2009 11:13:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
it is since were talking about 2 different things and they have different regulations for each one.

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
97423.7 in reply to 97423.6
Date: 6/18/2009 9:34:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
my player just got an offensive foul and it was the 5th team foul, no foul shots were taken, but the foul count did show 5 fouls so i think it is just a presentational error

go mama kitty 7- 19-10
This Post:
00
97423.8 in reply to 97423.7
Date: 6/19/2009 9:23:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
maybe it does not give shots on offensive fouls but if you had 4 offensive fouls and then a reach in foul you will be shooting 2 instead of having 1 team foul.

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
97423.9 in reply to 97423.5
Date: 6/23/2009 7:57:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
deliberate is the word to use, translates better than flagrant.

intentional is a good alternative option.

Last edited by Elmacca at 6/23/2009 7:59:33 AM

This Post:
00
97423.10 in reply to 97423.9
Date: 6/23/2009 10:58:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I presume flagrant would be the official terminology since that's what the NBA uses.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Message deleted
This Post:
00
97423.12 in reply to 97423.10
Date: 6/23/2009 3:48:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
I'm quite tempted to insult you, but as we don't speak the same language, kneecapping Bambi and giving him ice skates would be more your idea of subtle.

This Post:
00
97423.13 in reply to 97423.12
Date: 6/23/2009 3:54:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
WAT

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
97423.14 in reply to 97423.13
Date: 6/23/2009 6:43:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
ok, so was that a deliberate (or intentional) foul post, or a flagrant foul post?

Last edited by Elmacca at 6/23/2009 6:44:27 PM

This Post:
00
97423.15 in reply to 97423.10
Date: 7/2/2009 4:00:51 PM
New York Chunks
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
943943
So then all offensive fouls are "flagrant"? There are no other offensive fouls? Seems like here's a change we'd like to see, real offensive fouls. Those happen way more than flagrant fouls in the real NBA.

Don't ask what sort of Chunks they are, you probably don't want to know. Blowing Chunks since Season 4!
This Post:
00
97423.16 in reply to 97423.15
Date: 7/5/2009 9:27:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
No, they are not. The discussion here is about technical fouls.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."