BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Consistant player foul trouble

Consistant player foul trouble

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
99428.6 in reply to 99428.1
Date: 6/30/2009 3:54:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I'm not questioning your honesty, but is his OD that good? Because for a player to have sensational OD and 0 steals this season seems a bit odd.

He had 22 steals last season, so I guess his OD is that good but why doesn't he have atleast 1 steal this season?

This Post:
00
99428.7 in reply to 99428.6
Date: 6/30/2009 4:03:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
welcome in the world of random, the season isn't long and in my eyes OD shows more on the performance of his opponent then through steals. I have a superior OD player in my rooster, who maybe takes steals but he isn't significant stronger then the other guards.

This Post:
00
99428.8 in reply to 99428.7
Date: 6/30/2009 4:10:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
That holds true, but in this game: (13482699), the random seems to hit his team hard. Plays a 3-2 against a weaker team and gets only 1 steal?

But it is possible I guess. Its just that I am used to 0 steal players being centers with atrocious/pitiful OD.

This Post:
00
99428.9 in reply to 99428.1
Date: 6/30/2009 10:55:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
His inside D is awful and shot blocking atrocious. players must drive to the ring against him. consider training inside D

This Post:
00
99428.10 in reply to 99428.9
Date: 7/1/2009 12:15:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
Training defense doesn't help. I know from experience, if a player is a fouler he is all but useless and should be gotten rid of. It really is sad, like I said before the foul system is absolutely terrible. Instead of these GE changes that aren't even working, they really need to change the fouling. I mean seriously, hidden stats that are untrainable? It wouldn't even be so bad if so many players didn't get in foul trouble and end up playing 20 minutes per game every single game. Even the most foul happy guys in the NBA are that consistent at fouling, not to mention they eventually learn to defend and stop fouling as much.

This Post:
00
99428.11 in reply to 99428.1
Date: 7/1/2009 9:30:28 AM
Kitakyushu
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
12341234
I would have to say it is his awful inside D....

This Post:
00
99428.12 in reply to 99428.11
Date: 7/1/2009 1:24:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
Again, wrong. It should be, but that would be too convienient. My big is a prominent inside defender at the D.IV level and averages nearly 4 fouls a game. The invisible stat isn't a terrible idea, but it's terribly executed.

This Post:
00
99428.14 in reply to 99428.13
Date: 7/1/2009 3:57:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
No but maybe the 6 topics per week about it would mean it was terribly executed. And yes my team draws a lot of fouls, but a lot of them are offensive juggernauts in comparison to the teams I've played. Only rightfully so I should be getting to the line a lot. But something's wrong when a 3k PF with average game shape running Motion offense with an awful offensive flow is causing your 9k PF with 7 inside defense to get into foul trouble. That'd be the equivalent of Andrea Bargnani fouling out Tim Duncan.

This Post:
00
99428.16 in reply to 99428.14
Date: 7/5/2009 8:40:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7777
Bad news: You've got a fouler. Don't waste time training him.

Good news: You can usually find someone who'll buy him off the transfer list for about what he'd be worth if he weren't a fouler. (This isn't as true as it used to be.)

Advertisement