BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Awesome New Draft Prospects

Awesome New Draft Prospects

Set priority
Show messages by
From: stelaios

This Post:
00
216430.60 in reply to 216430.58
Date: 2/18/2017 8:05:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
10001000
I suppose it is set up that way in order to not have people know exactly what player is who. A way of making sure people dont "cheat" if they are in the same league perhaps.
I would guess that the names are not already given to players though at this stage and that is something that is done during the offseason process.
Just a wild guess about the last though.


Thanks for your reply. I believe that a change in this issue would be interesting.

Have a nice weekend.

This Post:
11
216430.61 in reply to 216430.11
Date: 3/15/2017 9:34:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
The best one I got and it was my 3rd choice:


Owner:
Shelbyville Sonics


Weekly salary: $ 3 038
Role: draws a paycheck


DMI: 0
Age: 18
Height: 6'3" / 190 cm
Potential: MVP
Game Shape: respectable
Jump Shot: respectable Jump Range: respectable
Outside Def.: inept Handling: inept
Driving: mediocre Passing: respectable
Inside Shot: awful Inside Def.: inept
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: inept
Stamina: average Free Throw: strong

Experience: atrocious TSP: 51 (34 + 17)

This Post:
00
216430.62 in reply to 216430.61
Date: 3/15/2017 9:48:36 PM
Leones del Cinaruco
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
27092709
I saw an eigthteen MVP with 62 TSP
*************


5 6
5 7
7 6
6 7
7 6

4 4


Edmon Sánchez (41683073)

*********

Looks like the draft was really improved this time. Is this a global phenomena?

This Post:
00
216430.64 in reply to 216430.63
Date: 3/16/2017 5:11:02 AM
Leones del Cinaruco
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
27092709
Let us see him...

This Post:
00
216430.66 in reply to 216430.65
Date: 3/16/2017 8:04:08 AM
Leones del Cinaruco
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
27092709

From: mplume

This Post:
00
216430.67 in reply to 216430.65
Date: 3/16/2017 8:48:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
We have a 65 one in Belgium but "only" 8 as potential.

From: lvess

This Post:
00
216430.69 in reply to 216430.68
Date: 3/16/2017 4:42:19 PM
Delaware 87ers
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
316316
It seems like the improvement in draftee starting skills has led to less draftees with glaring holes in their starting builds. That is definitely a good thing.

However, just because they have less glaring holes doesn't mean teams will automatically train them, which I suspect was the hope of the BB's. The fastest training methods still only allow a maximum of 3 trainees under ideal circumstances.

So in a couple years teams that decide to train only this seasons draftees will see big dividends. However, that will come at the cost of abandoned training for previous draftees. I don't see that as a 100% positive improvement.

Message deleted
Advertisement