BuzzerBeater Forums

I just said "reduce", and everybody will want to be the first of the series to have the HCA in the 3-games final.

I understand that I write too much, so it is hard to follow all I want to say.
What I said is that it could be a good idea to reduce both CT/TIE and HCA effects for the quarter and semi-final, not the regular league and not the final.
I hope I expressed it clearer.

I dont think this should be the question. in my opinion the question to aks is, why we are having 1 Game series.

Why is it not possible to make play offs one week longer?
why is it not possible to have more games a week during play offs?

There are several proposals in the sugggestion forum. Some of them might have disadvantages (e.g. having 3 games a week) but any of these I like better then having 1 game series.
all we do is waiting and preparing for play offs and after one game the most exciting part is over for most of us.

The problem here is that TiE/CT is unrealistic in the playoffs but is also something that brings in more gameplay.

One solution would have been to make the playoffs have longer series, but we already fit 5 games into two weeks, and I don't think it's very possible to fit in many more than that.

Another solution would be to let TiE/CT effects be smaller either during the playoffs or overall.

I think the key question to ask, really, is this:

How often should the #4 seed be able to beat the #1 seed by playing CT vs. normal?

Without showing any disrespect to my likely 4th place opponent - he will have no option other than to CT me next week. If (subject to GS/injuries I fail to progress by normalling a) it would be disaster and b) unbelievable.)

Both teams in with a shout of 4th are almost certain to have less enthusiasm than me and if my HCA doesnt prove strong enough to do the job I will be severly disappointed and would answer a lot of my own questions on TIE/CT.

WIth a lot of people commenting they have built up such high enthusiasm and like me would be disappointed to lose to a CT it raises a different question in my opinion.

Why can / does the system allow teams to build enthusiasm so often/quickly? Everyone complains about certain aspects of the game not mimicking real life but to send your team out 7+ (just quoting 1 guy) games in a row TIE seems highly unrealistic to me as well.

I saw a post by Brian James a while back about starting with enthusiasm 10 and trying to maintain it (only using CT when required) which to me seemed much more logical.

I sympathise with teams who have enjoyed good seasons only to lose at the business end of the season to a 'Kamikaze' order from a much inferior team.

The problem is that half of the teams simply don't make the playoffs, and right now there are teams that go three weeks without a competitive game. That really shouldn't be longer, and teams that play BB more casually shouldn't be forced to play it less casually during the playoffs; that's not fair to them either.

I agree that this is a major problem, but there are several proposals in the suggestions forum to solve it. Most of them I really like.

e.g. playing play downs, regroup the 5th to 8 seed for demotion etc.

I believe this would not only make it more interesting for teams who reached the play offs but also for the teams which are trying to stay in the league.