BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis

Training Speed Analysis (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
381.602 in reply to 381.601
Date: 7/9/2008 1:25:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
Let's say I train C/PF positions.
My question is will my C who played... let's say... 30 min as C and then, 18 min as PF (which would be 48 playing minutes in total ) get his training?

Thanks,
Sanjin

This Post:
00
381.603 in reply to 381.602
Date: 7/9/2008 1:27:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Yes. He gets credit for any minutes played at the trained position(s).

This Post:
00
381.604 in reply to 381.603
Date: 7/9/2008 1:39:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
I thought so, but I wasn't sure :D Thanks.

This Post:
00
381.605 in reply to 381.461
Date: 7/16/2008 2:02:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
4- Overall the picture seems to be that trainings for two positions are most efficient, provided you have enough trainees. Agree?


Is there data behind this -- I'm just curious because I've be looking for this kind of info.

Steve
Bruins

This Post:
00
381.606 in reply to 381.461
Date: 7/16/2008 2:04:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
1. How solid is the evidence that there really is any difference between different training types in the training speed for the primary skill? The values in the first post look suspiciously similar, wouldn't the theory be simpler/better if we just assume it's the same in all ten types? Especially since it is apparently claimed by the same theory that training speed for secondary skills is identical across types.


I think most big men trainers would tell you that Rebounding trains faster than Inside Shooting and Defense -- but I think that's probably based more on gut feel than hard facts at this point.

Steve
Bruins

Last edited by Solana_Steve at 7/16/2008 2:04:26 AM

This Post:
00
381.607 in reply to 381.606
Date: 7/18/2008 7:28:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
I trained this week for the first time JS for wingmens and no pops!

It is the JS training speed as same for wingmens as for guards? Thanks!

Last edited by Elon Musk at 7/18/2008 7:29:29 AM

Message deleted
This Post:
00
381.609 in reply to 381.607
Date: 7/18/2008 4:10:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
My impression is that training speeds are slowing back down again. Haven't heard any official words, but that's my observations.

Steve
Bruins

This Post:
00
381.610 in reply to 381.609
Date: 7/18/2008 8:10:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
My impression is that training speeds are slowing back down again. Haven't heard any official words, but that's my observations.

Steve
Bruins

i was thinking the same, but also had the potential paranoia ;) anyway training still is tricky...

This Post:
00
381.612 in reply to 381.609
Date: 8/1/2008 9:34:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
My experience of training in my first full season also suggests training has slowed (in comparison to the norms set forth for newbies go from).

My superstar potential 19 yr old (6'8") had 8 Rebounding trainings, and 1 Inside Defence training (all were at +48min) for C/PF's. He has yet to pop in Inside Defence which suggests the secondary training in R is more like 10weeks (10% or less), and the ID training is more like 4weeks (25%). Even at those rates he should have popped. I should add he currently is respectable in ID, with Strong R, Strong IS and Average SB for his major inside skills.

My 8 Rebounding training in a row (I know, we should be alternating but I wanted to get a view on training speeds) gave me the impression that this 19yr old was getting about 50-55 %....which is sort of in line with the 1.75weeks that is estimated.

That's my 10 cents worth.

Advertisement