BuzzerBeater Forums

I don't get the first sentence. In third league, I trained the big guys, sold one after a season and a half a bought a solid SG that was FA... next season sold another and bought a good PG that was FA... If you buy a free agent way better than the players you have on the positions that you're training then you're wasting money and training and it's a stupid move (not you as in you, but you as in general, people :) ) :)

i think this also shows the imbalance of the transfermarket through them(weekly ups and downs) and your ability to find cheap guys, but more players to buy means not so high prices because this change don't affect the number of selled players.

It is also possible to make good deals in this system, so that you sell a player and buy a better one this isn't a FA feature. So this change will happen for smart guys only with higher transfer sums, but if you look for a weaker replacement and maybe spend 80% of the price for the new player it makes a different if you get 2,5 Mio or 2,3 Mio.

again can't really agree... looking at my country I've seen free agents make big differences in third and fourth divisions because those managers could buy the for average 1.5m while the higher division teams went for those great players of 2.2-2.3+
but as I said, I'm basing this on my experience which may not correspond to the real global situation :)

this teams aren't really new, or have 1-2 player of this qualitys ;) My team just bought players of this quality(except trainees, which aren't really good for my team but i love the TU), so i profitate on 9 of 10 transfers from the reduces prices your teams maybe 2-4 of ten times.

try reading the now closed day trading post in bb global

day trading is a problem solved many seasons ago

even if he anwsered it himself, i like to say it the same way maybe because of other reasons:

- free agent makes training less effective, because the players don't get that much extra value so a player is worth less infrastructure like seats or staff. So it reduce the advantage of teams in lower division who usually could train more effective, and raises the adavantage of the high division in the infrastructure(tickets sells, tv and marketing)

- only top players are released as FA, and this usually are the players the top teams look for and not the new team and medium ones - so the bargain raises especially for them and reduces the prices for them and not for the players weaker teams need.

You are rather smart and understand well what is the main argument of the discussion about FA:the value of trained players,the comparison with the other forms of incomes,and the overall economy of BB.I yet explain why,with certain conditions,Fa could be useful to the economy of BB(I hope you read my previous post,and I'm almost sure you made it),you explain well your opinion,now the decision is of BBs
About the second point,I think it's however not true,because to have the money to buy a Fa,you have to sell often a weaker player.Someone will buy this player and will sell a weaker player and so on.In this way,at the end of the chain,we'll have on the market some players proper to lower teams.And if the system corrected the issues of the old system,maintaining a good rate of availability of player turned directly for lower teams(eliminating the useless,weak and not balanced players),I think it will be a great thing
About the strategy of having 1 superstar and other weaker player,I'm against this strategy but hey,it's the strategy of the game,if someone want to use it,he could have the possibility to make it ;D

what we need is a trade system. Anyone else in on this idea?

we have a trade system it act with money for players ;)