BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New inside zone or fix 2-3.

New inside zone or fix 2-3.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
181900.67 in reply to 181900.61
Date: 4/30/2011 3:49:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
It looks like if you had those players for a 2-3 defense, you would be better with. M2M anyway.

This Post:
11
181900.68 in reply to 181900.67
Date: 5/3/2011 7:29:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Just a quick question, what kind of player you prefer Serge Ibaka(he is really good at SB) or Marc Gasol?


If you pretend that people train SB, that skill should have a lower salary. What a manager can't do is to have an inside player with IS-ID-RE-SB that's an insane salary and even that the impact on the 2-3 is still not big enough(i don't think that having bigger SB will make 2-3 more efficient).

You can't ask the teams to sacrifice a lot just to run a ''2-3 in good conditions''.

That's why on this game people prefer a player like Marc Gasol with IS-ID-RE with lower salary than having 1 player with ID-RE-SB with lower IS because it's not worth his salary.


PD: It happens in real life, SB is ok, but it's not that important. On this game SB it raises a lot the salary, it's at the same level of inside shot, inside defense or rebound, but you can't put it on the same level importance.

This Post:
44
181900.69 in reply to 181900.68
Date: 5/5/2011 3:36:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Changing your strategy to conform to the GE: Good
Changing the GE to conform to your strategy: Bad

Just putting that out there. Saying that something tested ad nauseam by the BBs is "broken" is likely hyperbolic, and is definitely harmful.

This is exactly why I posted (182276.1). As a design principle, changing the GE based on popular strategies will destroy BB. That is not hyperbole.

Advertisement