BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Economy and draft

Economy and draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
182720.62 in reply to 182720.61
Date: 5/12/2011 4:35:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
One thing that I think you and maybe a lot of other people mistakenly believe is that GMs have some sort of say in the development of the game. There might be one or two who are in the loop, but the vast majority of GMs are just regular users who help out with the administration of the game.

having 1-3 buys of overpaying retardedly high for rookies to train u21/nt with their 4man roster of 1k salary scrubs, and logging on once every 2-3 weeks so they dont go bot and to switch up training..but from what I have heard, having a 10+ season account without a single buy ever or just 1 or 2 in lifetime, sporadically logging in to switch training is very allowable.


Why shouldn't it be? Is it unrealistic and ridiculous that a team can make 250+ transfers in 6 seasons? Should that be looked at and regulated as well? What is the acceptable number of transfers per year per team? I think that erring on the side of laissez-faire is better than being draconian.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
182720.63 in reply to 182720.61
Date: 5/13/2011 4:58:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404


What you dont understand is, farm teams are perfectly legal in this game (unfortunately).

What do you don't understand is that the problem in some kind of purchase is not on the buyer side,but on seller's adversaries side

I could not care less about the fact that a farm team want to buy a young player for 100M;I'm concerned about the fact that the seller,a my rival or potentially a my rival,can have 100M to spend on the market when he don't deserve it and didn't do anything to deserve it

That's the point,period

This Post:
11
182720.64 in reply to 182720.11
Date: 5/13/2011 8:26:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
244244
I feel like making the tv contracts/ attendance and whatnot more reflective of league strength instead of just what division you are in would help some.

This Post:
00
182720.66 in reply to 182720.65
Date: 5/14/2011 12:55:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I think this is completely fine. Teams who do poorly have a chance to improve their fortunes with a great draft pick. Why is that wrong? Having 4 million to spend and spending it wisely are two different things, and even if they do spend it wisely and promote, good for them. It only proves that the draft system, namely giving the teams that do poorly an opportunity to improve through getting a great draftee, works.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
182720.68 in reply to 182720.66
Date: 5/14/2011 6:30:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I think this is completely fine. Teams who do poorly have a chance to improve their fortunes with a great draft pick. Why is that wrong? Having 4 million to spend and spending it wisely are two different things, and even if they do spend it wisely and promote, good for them. It only proves that the draft system, namely giving the teams that do poorly an opportunity to improve through getting a great draftee, works.

It is wrong the amount of money that some teams receive for their draft picks,related to overall market conditions,that's all

It should have been improved TPA(not TPE) system,especially the control on young players sells has to be stronger

P.S. the draft system does not work because too few players have value from the draft,in relation to skill/age/height/potential ratio(I still don't understand why 19years old with the same rating of a 18 years old should not have higher skills...)

This Post:
00
182720.69 in reply to 182720.68
Date: 5/14/2011 8:00:32 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Imho a possible solution is to relate the strenght of the draftee to the amount invested (not 5-20k but much more) and all this linked to the divisions, a first division should pay 3m to have the possibility (good possibility) to pick a good young, a six division team should pay 500k, this is an example of course

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
00
182720.70 in reply to 182720.69
Date: 5/14/2011 8:05:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Imho a possible solution is to relate the strenght of the draftee to the amount invested (not 5-20k but much more) and all this linked to the divisions, a first division should pay 3m to have the possibility (good possibility) to pick a good young, a six division team should pay 500k, this is an example of course

I don't like this at all,it would be impossible to raise to the top divisions for the teams who are in the lower

From: Flamen

To: ned
This Post:
00
182720.71 in reply to 182720.69
Date: 5/14/2011 8:08:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13621362
What about linking good probability drafts to better leagues?

it makes sense that the best prospects sing up for the best leagues.

Advertisement