I've not seen, heard or experienced anything that backs that up. Is this based on anything other then your opinion?
why i should have more possibilities to tie then the opponent?
So if the team play against Hoop hooray, with normal vs normal it starts winning, when if have no chanche with normal vs TIE? The team who have chanches with normal against normal against them, should have the same possibilities to play tie like hoop against the opponents and should have the same advantage and in this case it becomes a strategic part, if you play TIE and loose a game which could cost the hca against the other superior team, or if you play normal more often win all leagues secure and have a sligthly disadvantage in the confrontation with the other superior team, which could cost also hca which will be a deciding factor in the PO.But it isn't a changing anything in favour for hoop, that his team play in a kindergarten if you remove tie.PS: Ok in the BBB, he got an advantage through it, because other team have more serious competition in their other games.No, that's not correct. :) The thing was that no team used to be good enough to win against Hoop Hoop Hooray (HHH) except perhaps if they threw away a CT agaianst a TIE from HHH. Thus, all other teams new that they had to throw away their chances of reaching the playoffs by playing CT agaianst HHH if they wanted a realistic chance to win. Consequently we all chose to play TIE against them, which they knew of course. Thus HHH could play TIE without even worrying about the opponent playing CT, and as the season progressed and enthusiasm was built they only became more and more dominant.
So if the team play against Hoop hooray, with normal vs normal it starts winning, when if have no chanche with normal vs TIE? The team who have chanches with normal against normal against them, should have the same possibilities to play tie like hoop against the opponents and should have the same advantage and in this case it becomes a strategic part, if you play TIE and loose a game which could cost the hca against the other superior team, or if you play normal more often win all leagues secure and have a sligthly disadvantage in the confrontation with the other superior team, which could cost also hca which will be a deciding factor in the PO.But it isn't a changing anything in favour for hoop, that his team play in a kindergarten if you remove tie.PS: Ok in the BBB, he got an advantage through it, because other team have more serious competition in their other games.
Why has no-one talked about collusion to CT dominant teams? I am sure if 4 or 5 teams in the JBBL all agreed to CT me no matter when or where all season i would for sure slip up every now and then..... i am sure this would also be true for many other teams who typically dominate their league/country.
. Try to look at that thing by this way - how many times anybody usually get by "accident" TIE game on both sides? The probability that you will TIE and the other team do the same is quite small.