BuzzerBeater Forums

Mate, stop pretending you're not being a smartass, we all know you are!
And frankly, I don't think anyone really cares.

Never said I wasn't being a smartarse. Never said I was using language that was friendly... I said that I didn't bring the radford discussion up again. My question was directed at his entire rosters salary which he used to prevent relegation to look at himself before offering advice which is common knowledge in this league.

Forums are for opinions. People don't necessarily like to hear opinions that are directed at them that they don't agree with. When they try to argue back with statements that hold no weight, I will always continue to explain the reasoning behind my opinion.

I don't have a personal issue against petevas like I did with holtz, but when I am told I don't know what im talking about by giving an opinion which is something that everyone else believes, I am going to make it my mission to prove my point. If he makes rediculous claims like radford only costing him $200k I'm going to point out where he is wrong.

There is 2 sides to every argument. Everyone can hate on me for being one side of it, but does anyone actually disagree with what I'm saying? If he didn't continuously argue that I'm wrong, it would have stopped long ago...

It's his team. Let him do what he wants. If you're trying to help others, put your opinion down and let them decide. If you're just trying to win the argument, that's just sad. Either way, it can be let go. Who's gonna be the bigger person?

Who's gonna be the bigger person?

Probably whoever eats more, unless there is a large metabolism imbalance.

Who's gonna be the bigger person?

Probably whoever eats more, unless there is a large metabolism imbalance.

:P

There are other medical issues with weight loss, too. I hear about them all the time, though they are usually from people who eat lots and exercise little. Funny that...

If I put my opinion down I don't expect anyone to take it as the ultimate guide to success. I don't even care if I'm ignored.

If someone tells me I have no idea what I am talking about when I explain why I'm 100% correct, that is when an argument is incited. When that person says something on that topic in the future that is incorrect I am going to explain why that is incorrect.

If I put my opinion down I don't expect anyone to take it as the ultimate guide to success. I don't even care if I'm ignored.

If someone tells me I have no idea what I am talking about when I explain why I'm 100% correct, that is when an argument is incited. When that person says something on that topic in the future that is incorrect I am going to explain why that is incorrect.

I like your thinking. Is there a point to continue it, though? All you can do is show how you think they are wrong and then leave it, no? If they (or everyone for that matter) don't believe you, is there a point to continue?

I have the same problem sometimes, I think, and I'm trying to work on just letting. Some people will stick to their opinions no matter what seemingly great evidence I can provide.

I can see what you are saying, but I still don't think you fully understand what I am saying. Hopefully answering your questions will help...

Is there a point to continue it, though?

In my opinion, not really. My point has been put across with clear explanations behind them... Unfortunately, there has been situations where further explaining has been required.. When the situation is argued with false claims and ignorant statements or the outcome is played down to be less than what it really is, I am going to continue to explain what I am saying. Especially when I'm told I don't know what I'm talking about... I understand everyone is getting sick of it, but no one else has actually said I am wrong, just that they are sick of hearing it. How can I argue a point if I am not given a point to argue?

All you can do is show how you think they are wrong and then leave it, no?

If they continue to argue the facts with nonsense, then no. All I am doing is responding to his comments.

If they (or everyone for that matter) don't believe you, is there a point to continue?

If they question the logic behind my reasoning, and I am not wrong, then there is definitely a point to continue. . If they defend against me with points that are incorrect, then there is definitely a point to continue. I cant just randomly continue to argue unless I have something to argue... If I am given a genuine reason why I am wrong and have no comeback, then there is no point to continue. If there is nothing saying I am wrong, then there is no point to continue...

So basically what I'm trying to say is that I will always give my opinions as that is what forums are for. If my opinions are debated with stupidity I am always going to continue to challenge until I am proven wrong or the other person realises they don't have a case to argue... So I really don't care about peoples opinion of me if they can't see there is 2 sides to an argument. If what I am saying is right, yet I still have to read nonsense like "radford only cost me 200k", how am I in the wrong for defending my opinion, especially when I was told I dont know what im talking about when the opinion was given?

Radford built up my weekly merchandise profit every week. So you could say i lost x amont of $$$, but I was never in the red till I bought other players in the final week.

Suarez not shaking Evra's hand then Ferdinand not shaking Suarez' hand hahah.
jw

seems like everyone forgets that Ferdinand di dthat. Lets not forget, they are one of the biggest rival in english football.