BuzzerBeater Forums

Quite the simplistic and wrong take.

Where was it stated easy access to good draft?? I didn't ask for the players to be replaced from the bot leagues to the draft I beg you to read properly before stating wrong takes on my suggestions.

"Yes, it's harder for micronations NT to compete, but I don't see why they should have the right to do so."

Maybe for BB not to lose players whose goal is not to compete but to develop players for their own country? The user Sporting Chisinau clearly stated that he has no joy in his league without the developing players part what did you not understand here.

it's harder for micronations NT to compete, but I don't see why they should have the right to do so.

Really bro? So only China, Italy and the nations with 700 users should dominate for ever in this game? As the future NT coach of Moldova I'm going to state, what a boring and unfair game that is.

I'm not asking for draft to be remade with unfair advantage for Micronations teams. What I am suggesting IS:

- Tweak certain aspects of the game to give Micronations a fighting help against the big countries.
As the game is right now it's virtually IMPOSSIBLE for any micronation to compete for the top 30/40, making the game much more static and dull. It would be highly exciting if Micronations with a good training plan for the future could aim for their NT like I do to get into the top 30/40.

Which aspects should be tweaked you ask?

Literally what I stated before - PUT the drafted Superstar/MvP/HoF/All Time Great 18/19 year olds FROM the bot teams into the TRANSFER LIST

I'm not saying and never said these players should be given for free to micronation teams, that would also be boring and unfair.

What I'm saying is instead as happens with free agents and retired players, future ESSENTIAL micronations players should not rot in the bot teams. With this tweak ANY team in the game could buy an interesting TRAINABLE player, which means ANY team could buy the drafted player from the micronations thus IMPROVING and helping the future of that micronation u21/NT.

Tell me do you think it makes sense for micronations managers to watch the transfer list with 30 MvP's from China or Usa for example!? While not even a single one from Moldova!?

SECOND TWEAK (suggestion from Sporting which I haven't thought of it before)

Let Utopian teams have the option like spend 10 points and discover which players come from micronations specifically. The draft and transfer market is flooded with players from the big nations while micronations would be lucky to even make a proper top 70 NT in 10 seasons (3 year real time lol)
IT IS NOT FAIR that Micronations have so many handicaps developing their players. It's nations with 700 users vs nations with 10 users.

These suggestions would simply be helping hands to micronations and would keep the game FAIR, ENTERTAINING and above all FUN.



Last edited by sergio at 10/9/2021 10:23:17 AM

I mean honestly what is there to disagree? Tell me where am I wrong or where did I suggest something unfair. I thought that you yourself a micronation manager would understand all the above stated points easily.

Respectfully, 170 users is completely different from 10 users. And nowhere I'm suggesting winning u21 world cups or NT world cups because that is impossible for a micronation. I'm clearly stating - COMPETE with the bigger nations for top 30/40 which for the big big nations like China, Italy, etc would not threathen their domination at all, they would keep being the bigger teams, the ones who win it all, as always the dominating teams, according to real life.

It would give users who dilligently train their players for micronations u21/NT a possibility of FIGHTING in the cups. Simply fighting. Is this something so unbelievable and unjustt to ask lol?

Watch this I'm not even suggesting winning any cups or top 10 or top 20 because that would be impossible, I'm suggesting for countries not to ROT forever at the end of the table like Wales, Pakistan, Moldova, etc. How can this be unfair?

If it is impossible for micronations to win u21/NT cups then please explain it to me how it wouldn't be fair for bigger countries.

Last edited by sergio at 10/9/2021 10:38:55 AM

Secondary to some primary to some. While I agree what you said and Korea with 4 users being where they are is to be praised! A club team game can also involve you building a drafted team in which case it's players from your nation. Or you can build a team for yourself, for your u21 and for your NT while also maximizing merchandise income with that. It still involves National team. As of this moment, for micronations managers only 1% or less of them achieve this.

Thing is how does this treat micronations different since this already happens with retired users where their players go to the Transfer List. This would be exactly the same, give users from nations with 50 teams or less the possibility to see players from their nations that rot on bot leagues in the transfer list. This would not give them the players for free nor it never would make the game unfair for bigger nations. If you define 50 active users or less, the moment the active user count surpasses the defined number then the rule for that specific micronation would be removed. It would still keep things completely fair.

Yes there are users like in Korea where they are hyper agressive on their draftees and with a great training plan. But this is an exception. Only a handful of micronation managers manage to achieve this. And even so in a dying game they only managed 45th place. It's really sad to witness 20k players in the main NT's not only in Moldova but in a lots of micronations.

As of now not only BB risks of losing more managers from the micronations but it also potentially keeps new managers whose goal is to build a team from their country away from the game.

Most of the replies I read from users from macronations is pointless whining coupled with a lack of long term vision. Not only that, when there comes any change to the game suddenly there's more than 20 users bashing and attacking the change without any insightful reason or explanation, for me that's simply spamming.

Also why do you think that you see more macronations users talking than micronations? Maybe because there are 100x more macronations active users and 1000x more macronation forum users compared to micronations, no?

It is indeed so unfair that Italy has had so far more than 30 MvP/HoF+ draftees on the transfer list plus all the trainable MvP/HoF+ draftees at their respective clubs (more than 50 I've skirmmed through almost all Italian teams from Div I to Div III) meanwhile countries like Pakistan and Moldova have had a COMBINED GRAND TOTAL OF

*tum tum tum tum*

1 MvP on the transfer list (from Pakistan, Moldova had 0 MvP+ draftees on the transfer list.)

2 COUNTRIES = 1 Drafted MvP on the Transfer List

So so unfair for the macronations I don't even know how will they be able to keep competing and build their own teams am I right? (/sarcasm)

Any more from me on this topic is also pointless talking because we're not discussing actionable measures, as always it was a pleasure talking with you perpete, may the buzzerbeater gods bless your team and your korean NT.