someone else argued for removing national tourneys infavor of international
de facto you are always saying that you want to remove the national, for international ones ;) Because you don't play national anymore when you paly international(and yes i know in international one they speak all your language ;) ), and there is no meaningful national champ left with the guys who play the national one.
I also said that the prizes for higher tourneys (so national tourney teams income) would be HIGHER and that people should get a BASE amount based on what tourney they qualified. So the 500th team would by default be advantaged over the 501st.
so really the 500 team who get for their one game(he is the favorit to fly out of the cup the first round), so much money that he could afford a better roster(to compensate the TIE which a gift to the 501) and so much the 501 team earned when he gets in round 5 or 6 or even maybe win it?
So the 500 get money for each game let say 700k, and the 501 get maybe 100 to make it fair, do you really want so much disparity? And want really to have this one calculated with a similiar formula then the tv money, where the top group have to pay 100k more salary in average to get 10k more money?(which is far away from those money who give a advantage to team 500)