BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > BB Is Really Starting to Siphon the Yolk

BB Is Really Starting to Siphon the Yolk

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
90900.63 in reply to 90900.62
Date: 5/25/2009 11:22:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I agree that not everyone should develop into a superstar. The inflated talent level of leagues would become absurd. I didn't realize that no ready-made stars came out in the drafts though. That's not right either.

This Post:
00
90900.64 in reply to 90900.52
Date: 5/27/2009 6:25:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
Getting rid of retarded player potentials--I like games that are open-ended. If I want to train a player until all of his skills are wondrous, I should be able to, even if the guy is 28 or something.

Bad idea. Not everyone can have the potential to be great.


Then get rid of training altogether. If every 6'10" allstar can be trained to colossal rebounding skills, then all 6'10" players have the potential to be great rebounders, even if they suck at everything else. And if I can train a player into a one-trick-turd like that, why shouldn't I be able to train him into a Barkley-esque PF? Because 5 seasons ago someone decided to slam the door shut on training, just at the end of a rather long hallway.

Free Agents--freaking stop it. There is no reason to release an Italian with 13k salary from a bot team.

What's the problem? Don't like him, don't buy him.


Free Agents take money out of the game. Period. Why bother having the money in the game in the first place if you need to create a mechanism to take it out?

Monthly ticket prices--I like the fact that I can make my own mind up about what I'm charging at the gate, but I don't like the 1st of the month restriction. Seasons don't start and end (and promotions and relegations don't take place) on the first of the month, so why should changes in ticket prices?

Agreed. But it probably shouldn't be adjustable every game. Or there should be a penalty for owners who adjust their prices all the time and piss off their fans.


I liked the idea of being able to change prices at regular intervals during the season: at the start of the season, interconference play, last round of regular season, playoffs.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
From: darykjozef

To: Coco
This Post:
00
90900.65 in reply to 90900.50
Date: 5/27/2009 6:46:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
I think I want to add to your list: fix the fan survey!

I went 12-10 in my second season in the NBBA, made the conference finals, where I lost to a monster team and my fans give my team 3 balls for this season, and an average total of 2 balls.

It's just ridiculous.



When I promoted to the NBBA after going 20-2 in II, my fans gave that season a grade of 3.5. They should've been kissing my starfish for taking that crappy team to such great heights.

Another thing I hate about the fan survey is that every time I lose a game, regardless of who beats me, the "played well in our last league game" is .5-1*, even if I lose by 1 point in triple-overtime. What a fickle bunch of twats my fans are.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
90900.66 in reply to 90900.50
Date: 5/27/2009 8:17:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Amen to that! I just finished my second year in Div II, was 13-9 this year compared to 11-11 my first. My fan survey is in shambles—pathetic! What is a manager to do?

Pappy
This Post:
00
90900.67 in reply to 90900.66
Date: 5/27/2009 6:30:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
I consider potential as a thing that should prevent teams which started first to have best trained squad so easily - if anybody could be hall of famer they would just train their players. Now they have to bother to choose the ones with potential or based on expenses and their competition prefer the ones with just right for them. If you can train (and be able to pay) everyone to all-around legendary skills this game would be boring as newer teams almost could not catch up because the shorter time of training. I guess that was an important reason why potential was added to the game (i wasn't there in Season 3, didn't read the news release about this thing).

Potential and salaries are limits to prevent all legendary rosters and forcing you to looking for best impact/price ratio both at the moment and long term. Not that bad thing I guess.

This Post:
00
90900.68 in reply to 90900.66
Date: 5/27/2009 7:50:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Amen to that! I just finished my second year in Div II, was 13-9 this year compared to 11-11 my first. My fan survey is in shambles—pathetic! What is a manager to do?



I hate to compare to HT but it is relevant. It would be nice if your fans had expectations to compare to results for each season, so if a team that is horrible fares well the fans are happier, and vice versa.

This Post:
00
90900.71 in reply to 90900.69
Date: 5/27/2009 8:03:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Good point. In HT I have always been an average Joe, never higher than III, and just briefly there.

Message deleted
Advertisement