BuzzerBeater Forums

I mean honestly what is there to disagree? Tell me where am I wrong or where did I suggest something unfair. I thought that you yourself a micronation manager would understand all the above stated points easily.

Respectfully, 170 users is completely different from 10 users. And nowhere I'm suggesting winning u21 world cups or NT world cups because that is impossible for a micronation. I'm clearly stating - COMPETE with the bigger nations for top 30/40 which for the big big nations like China, Italy, etc would not threathen their domination at all, they would keep being the bigger teams, the ones who win it all, as always the dominating teams, according to real life.

It would give users who dilligently train their players for micronations u21/NT a possibility of FIGHTING in the cups. Simply fighting. Is this something so unbelievable and unjustt to ask lol?

Watch this I'm not even suggesting winning any cups or top 10 or top 20 because that would be impossible, I'm suggesting for countries not to ROT forever at the end of the table like Wales, Pakistan, Moldova, etc. How can this be unfair?

If it is impossible for micronations to win u21/NT cups then please explain it to me how it wouldn't be fair for bigger countries.

Last edited by sergio at 10/9/2021 10:38:55 AM

Secondary to some primary to some. While I agree what you said and Korea with 4 users being where they are is to be praised! A club team game can also involve you building a drafted team in which case it's players from your nation. Or you can build a team for yourself, for your u21 and for your NT while also maximizing merchandise income with that. It still involves National team. As of this moment, for micronations managers only 1% or less of them achieve this.

Thing is how does this treat micronations different since this already happens with retired users where their players go to the Transfer List. This would be exactly the same, give users from nations with 50 teams or less the possibility to see players from their nations that rot on bot leagues in the transfer list. This would not give them the players for free nor it never would make the game unfair for bigger nations. If you define 50 active users or less, the moment the active user count surpasses the defined number then the rule for that specific micronation would be removed. It would still keep things completely fair.

Yes there are users like in Korea where they are hyper agressive on their draftees and with a great training plan. But this is an exception. Only a handful of micronation managers manage to achieve this. And even so in a dying game they only managed 45th place. It's really sad to witness 20k players in the main NT's not only in Moldova but in a lots of micronations.

As of now not only BB risks of losing more managers from the micronations but it also potentially keeps new managers whose goal is to build a team from their country away from the game.

Most of the replies I read from users from macronations is pointless whining coupled with a lack of long term vision. Not only that, when there comes any change to the game suddenly there's more than 20 users bashing and attacking the change without any insightful reason or explanation, for me that's simply spamming.

Also why do you think that you see more macronations users talking than micronations? Maybe because there are 100x more macronations active users and 1000x more macronation forum users compared to micronations, no?

It is indeed so unfair that Italy has had so far more than 30 MvP/HoF+ draftees on the transfer list plus all the trainable MvP/HoF+ draftees at their respective clubs (more than 50 I've skirmmed through almost all Italian teams from Div I to Div III) meanwhile countries like Pakistan and Moldova have had a COMBINED GRAND TOTAL OF

*tum tum tum tum*

1 MvP on the transfer list (from Pakistan, Moldova had 0 MvP+ draftees on the transfer list.)

2 COUNTRIES = 1 Drafted MvP on the Transfer List

So so unfair for the macronations I don't even know how will they be able to keep competing and build their own teams am I right? (/sarcasm)

Any more from me on this topic is also pointless talking because we're not discussing actionable measures, as always it was a pleasure talking with you perpete, may the buzzerbeater gods bless your team and your korean NT.

If you're talking about single clubs then that is plenty truthful.

But from this POV 100 clubs from III. League have much more buying power and money to spend compared to II. clubs.
Besides I've checked the management of many Moldova clubs and it's really poor management. Very few users actually manage their money well instead of pointlessly spending it. Also Micronations clubs tend to overpay a lot compared to macronations clubs for the same calibre of players.