BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Remove possibility to play TIE

Remove possibility to play TIE

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
125223.65 in reply to 125223.64
Date: 12/31/2009 2:04:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Why has no-one talked about collusion to CT dominant teams? I am sure if 4 or 5 teams in the JBBL all agreed to CT me no matter when or where all season i would for sure slip up every now and then..... i am sure this would also be true for many other teams who typically dominate their league/country.

No idea why no one has done that. For me the collusion problem is not really a big issue, it's merely a bad side effect od a system that in itself is bad and clumpsy, so I prefer to focus on changing the enthusiasm system as such rather than the small side effect of this bad system.

From: Coach Ash

This Post:
00
125223.66 in reply to 125223.21
Date: 1/8/2010 3:41:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
I vote for removing TIE, too. The fact that people use this option offering it to each other to raise their enthusiasm (which does have a significant effect on the game) is inacceptable.

My suggestion is, if it can't be removed and people want to keep it in the game tactics: Lower the impact of enthusiasm in games and strengthen the effect of team skills and tactics on the outcome of league matches.


This Post:
00
125223.67 in reply to 125223.66
Date: 1/8/2010 9:53:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
No, I tottall disagree... A team in real life is able to play with the backups cin an easy cup game and arrange for the starters a relax programm the day before the game against their rival...

This Post:
00
125223.69 in reply to 125223.68
Date: 1/8/2010 10:42:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Special Treatment to the players by Physios (or something like that, I don't know the exact word in English).

From: brian

To: Coco
This Post:
00
125223.71 in reply to 125223.70
Date: 1/8/2010 11:19:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Right, and you can already get special physio treatment for you players with the massage trainer specialty.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
125223.72 in reply to 125223.31
Date: 1/11/2010 12:49:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
. Try to look at that thing by this way - how many times anybody usually get by "accident" TIE game on both sides? The probability that you will TIE and the other team do the same is quite small.



This is absolutely false. I have NEVER arranged a mutual TIE, yet it happens all of the time in my league games. Managing enthusiasm is part of the game, and if two players do it well, it doesnt imply collusion not one bit.

Take it Easy is a term many people have a problem with, it implies no effort at all. Change from TIE, Norm, and CT to Trying hard, trying really hard, and trying really really hard and half of these arguments are moot.

This Post:
00
125223.73 in reply to 125223.72
Date: 1/11/2010 4:10:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
but the fact that there is collusion is really not speaking for TIE. still if people email each other to play normal, i think that's using the power of the enthusiasm in a negative unfair way.

i think enthusiasm is way too overrated anyways in this game, and would vote for giving more tactical options for coaches and give then tactics more importance and more impact than enthusiasm.

This Post:
00
125223.74 in reply to 125223.1
Date: 1/13/2010 2:51:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i think we can use TIE in a game but not consecutively. as ive seen last season PO contenders TIE their last 5 games. in reality i think a team wont play easy 5 consecutive games so they can get superstrong later.

From: pudussu
This Post:
00
125223.75 in reply to 125223.74
Date: 1/17/2010 3:56:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
A first simple thing to do is remove the sentence concerning enthusiam in the game sum-up. Then nobody can know if there effectivly was a TIE.
And people can't verify if their opponent has respected the Mutual TIE.

Advertisement