BuzzerBeater Forums

Who's gonna be the bigger person?

Probably whoever eats more, unless there is a large metabolism imbalance.

Who's gonna be the bigger person?

Probably whoever eats more, unless there is a large metabolism imbalance.

:P

There are other medical issues with weight loss, too. I hear about them all the time, though they are usually from people who eat lots and exercise little. Funny that...

If I put my opinion down I don't expect anyone to take it as the ultimate guide to success. I don't even care if I'm ignored.

If someone tells me I have no idea what I am talking about when I explain why I'm 100% correct, that is when an argument is incited. When that person says something on that topic in the future that is incorrect I am going to explain why that is incorrect.

If I put my opinion down I don't expect anyone to take it as the ultimate guide to success. I don't even care if I'm ignored.

If someone tells me I have no idea what I am talking about when I explain why I'm 100% correct, that is when an argument is incited. When that person says something on that topic in the future that is incorrect I am going to explain why that is incorrect.

I like your thinking. Is there a point to continue it, though? All you can do is show how you think they are wrong and then leave it, no? If they (or everyone for that matter) don't believe you, is there a point to continue?

I have the same problem sometimes, I think, and I'm trying to work on just letting. Some people will stick to their opinions no matter what seemingly great evidence I can provide.

I can see what you are saying, but I still don't think you fully understand what I am saying. Hopefully answering your questions will help...

Is there a point to continue it, though?

In my opinion, not really. My point has been put across with clear explanations behind them... Unfortunately, there has been situations where further explaining has been required.. When the situation is argued with false claims and ignorant statements or the outcome is played down to be less than what it really is, I am going to continue to explain what I am saying. Especially when I'm told I don't know what I'm talking about... I understand everyone is getting sick of it, but no one else has actually said I am wrong, just that they are sick of hearing it. How can I argue a point if I am not given a point to argue?

All you can do is show how you think they are wrong and then leave it, no?

If they continue to argue the facts with nonsense, then no. All I am doing is responding to his comments.

If they (or everyone for that matter) don't believe you, is there a point to continue?

If they question the logic behind my reasoning, and I am not wrong, then there is definitely a point to continue. . If they defend against me with points that are incorrect, then there is definitely a point to continue. I cant just randomly continue to argue unless I have something to argue... If I am given a genuine reason why I am wrong and have no comeback, then there is no point to continue. If there is nothing saying I am wrong, then there is no point to continue...

So basically what I'm trying to say is that I will always give my opinions as that is what forums are for. If my opinions are debated with stupidity I am always going to continue to challenge until I am proven wrong or the other person realises they don't have a case to argue... So I really don't care about peoples opinion of me if they can't see there is 2 sides to an argument. If what I am saying is right, yet I still have to read nonsense like "radford only cost me 200k", how am I in the wrong for defending my opinion, especially when I was told I dont know what im talking about when the opinion was given?

Radford built up my weekly merchandise profit every week. So you could say i lost x amont of $$$, but I was never in the red till I bought other players in the final week.

Suarez not shaking Evra's hand then Ferdinand not shaking Suarez' hand hahah.
jw

seems like everyone forgets that Ferdinand di dthat. Lets not forget, they are one of the biggest rival in english football.

[Sigh...]

I know im going to be shunned for this, but...

Radford was no more effective than any $100k player since meateors had such weak inside players. Since radfords salary was $360k, your merchandise would have to be around $260k higher than normal to justify it... Also you tell someone about how bad it is to not make a weekly profit, yet you ran at a loss to beat a team who had $217k in salaries. Without radford you still would have won and banked a 6 figure profit for the week, but you give someone else advice about financial matters...

Why do you still try to justify it? Do you really not understand?

I never tried to justify that buying radford was a good idea. In case you forget, I agreed with you about but buying such players as a bad idea. You keep try to make people believe that i did it intentionally when I obviously didn't. I know that even 2 50k players instead one, 100k player would have been better. In case you forget, I did say if meat doesn't buy any inside players, I'm a chance. You figuered it was all to do with Radfored. Wrong! I knew what I was suppose to do, and despite that, tried to sell Radford, cause I knew that I did not need him. I have never tried to argue your points. I have only tried to answer your questions and yet that is never good enough for you. You then go on to insult my intelligence by trying to pass of your opions as facts, and then denying ever doing so. Then you go to say. " If someone tells me I have no idea what I am talking about when I explain why I'm 100% correct, that is when an argument is incited". You were never 100% correct about most thing as you hadn't and could never proove you were. Seriously, you need to let go and get over youself.

When I tried helping fish out with my opion, I based it on a few seasons ago for starters. Instead of you adding to that with your own opinion possitively, you just thought, 'hey, what a great opportunity to give him more shit'. Instead, you simply could have said, hey i disagree, and here is what i think would be better. However, you just went on questioning that whole Radford thing.

Why do you still try to justify it? Do you really not understand?

Why are you even still trying to win a poinless arguement? Obviously you dont understand shit and just keep trying to justify your points when in reallity, you are just useless in doing so.

One more thing, just like in your last post to me in s18, not gonna respond cause you are just typing too much bs. So say what you believe is true, and offend me in any way. Unless you buy a dictionary and figure out what fact actually means, then there is no point in responding to anything you have to say.

Gota love a good win with 48 less rebounds than your opponent :)