BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
Australia - I.1 > Season 18
Back to the Sneak Peek
Australia - I.1
S25
353
Season 24
369
Season 23
253
Where is the Season 23 thread?
4
Season 22
342
The end of an era
19
Season 21 (now with exciting n...
461
thread to discuss whether non-...
3
Season 20
634
Jump Range
11
Season 19
437
Season 18
660
Season 17
84
ASW Season 17
12
Season 16
304
Season 16 Allstar Game
19
Goodbye
5
Season 15
84
BOT?
23
Finals time!
15
<
>
Favorite Folders
Season 18
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
DireWolf (2)
bryce_gibbs (1)
coachnoodles (1)
Monkeybiz (1)
Managed by a computerised player (1)
iwen (1)
datzilla (1)
Whitebeard (1)
ezlife (1)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
datzilla
To:
yodabig
This Post:
0
200170.651
in reply to
200170.650
Date: 2/6/2012 3:47:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
110
See anyone there you can turn into a franchise player?
Not really franchise but might be good back up for DFBS. I'd say Royce Raddiffe.
Yo! Yo! D for D best PF in D Aussie BB. D Name is Kye Duffill
(10080211)
, averages nothing but pure amazing! Vote for Duffman!
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
coachnoodles
To:
Whitebeard
This Post:
0
200170.652
in reply to
200170.651
Date: 2/6/2012 4:11:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
191
Well done on getting Cranshaw i was sniffing around there as well but decided to restructure my bigs first and then worry about my guards a bit later.
Good to see him on aussie shores!
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
ezlife
To:
yodabig
This Post:
0
200170.653
in reply to
200170.650
Date: 2/6/2012 4:53:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
127
Do you think the BB-gods are trying to "balance" the game by creating less high potential players?
- many people have been whining about teams with super high total salaries
having a pool with more low potential players would lower the pool of high salaries players in the long run and thus create some sort of a salary cap that some managers have asked for.
hmm... does that make sense?
or would it be just some kind of a "bad season" and next season could feature 3 HoF in the same draft?
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
DireWolf
To:
ezlife
This Post:
0
200170.654
in reply to
200170.653
Date: 2/6/2012 4:56:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
214
ABBL drafts have always sucked unfortunately. Generally have to look to the lower divisions to find the good rookies.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Monkeybiz
To:
DireWolf
This Post:
0
200170.655
in reply to
200170.654
Date: 2/6/2012 5:19:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237
indeed...it find it cheaper to just buy a trainee than to spend so much money on the draft and get a crappy player
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Managed by a computerised
To:
Monkeybiz
This Post:
0
200170.656
in reply to
200170.655
Date: 2/6/2012 5:40:32 PM
Koopasaurus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
300
Well you and Direwolf will never get a good rookie cos you guys never get the first three picks. There are only ever two or three good rookies (be lucky to even get one good one in the abbl lately) per draft.
There is a good chance in season 19's abbl draft though with team smelts going bot. So even with the second or third pick you can get a steal. So start tanking boys!
Common show us the season schedule already so we can start the game of politics err I mean BB. LOL
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
DireWolf
To:
Managed by a computerised
This Post:
0
200170.657
in reply to
200170.656
Date: 2/6/2012 5:46:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
214
I didn't mean my picks, it's a bonus most of the time if i get someone who isn't a 19 year old bench warmer. The ABBL draft overall is usually pretty crappy and it's rare there will be any keepers worth training at all. I'm not complaining, makes sense that the good picks should go to lower divisions but wouldn't mind the ABBL draft being a little bit more interesting.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Whitebeard
To:
DireWolf
This Post:
0
200170.658
in reply to
200170.657
Date: 2/6/2012 6:15:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
289
Bleh...! As expected the draft is normally quite ordinary in ABBL. Interesting enough I got my first 3 preferences without changing the order. They must have been bad. I guess I should start with #48 next time.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
iwen
To:
yodabig
This Post:
0
200170.660
in reply to
200170.275
Date: 3/14/2012 3:38:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345
So I guess I was right about Bynum being faaaaaaar better than DeAndre Jordan.
It ain't even a contest.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images