Let me give you a simple example of why you system is completly flawed , you have not considered that starting point of new clubs.
Whilst you say there is an increase in money, this is true during the game, week by week, even thoughit is not comparible to the amount players prices have increased.
Where it is not true is when you get a new team, you get the same $300,000 plus a few weekly extras. In simple terms , a new team used to be able to buy Average to Respectable ratings on players at the age of between 18 - 20, now we have to buy inept to average rated players as a starting point to build a team. This is because we can no linger afford the players like last season, surely you should have increased the amount of money given to start up teams upon signing up to your game to compensate for the massive growth in the market.
The only teams that can afford these prices are teams that have been in the game for a few seasons, yet they didnt start off with this disability we now have, players were cheaper back then.
You even recognis the problem by your new bulletin about bring retired players back into the market, this is to soak up money and try and spread the pricing over the market place. I feel you know ou have created an issue, but are yet to understand just how bad you have made it.
You will cost yourself new people signing up, as the game takes to long to truly become even a bottom ladder team in, you need to consider that people play this for fun, and even the startegic challenge, however, they dont want it to turn into a complete business operation to make it work, where we are playing catch up all the time to the teams that were here before, whilst naturally they would be more porgressed, you have created an even greater divide.
I also think you should consider that, none of the GM's are hurt by this action, they are all long establsihed teams with large financial pockets, but we are tyring to tell you that us smaller clubs are getting seriosuly hurt by the choices you have made.