Again, Terrance Hammond arguably was the best player on the U21 by the end of the season. Here were his skills:
4/2/2/1/1/1 -17/16/17/8
In the end his secondaries didn't matter. I think magiker is right, the point he is making is that whats good for NT/U21 is different from whats good for your club team. U21 is an arms race.
Now obviously we went solely LI last season, making big guys with great primaries but terrible secondaries (Hammond, Ashville etc) more valuable. Every team and every season is different. In Season 16, until Harris Carson and some others came along, the team was somewhat based on outside offense (Suarez, Beverly, etc). In that situation, a big with less IS and more JS, and other subs is more useful. K now I'm being super obvious. Just saying that I understand the point magiker is trying to make differentiating club teams and national teams.
Last edited by jfarb at 11/2/2011 4:58:16 PM