BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > U21 National Team Debate Thread

U21 National Team Debate Thread (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Panic

This Post:
00
199844.68 in reply to 199844.67
Date: 11/2/2011 5:13:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5656
Part of our PR disarray was solely my fault last season. I apologized already on the offsite, and completely forgot to issue an onsite apology. If elected, I'd be all for more contests and more of everything. We have some newer managers recently influxing into the offsite in the past couple months, and their involvement could be crucial in future seasons. Helping out newer managers is always a smart move, because the more hands on deck and more support across the board is never a bad thing.

For another, scouting changes may not be necessary, but changes to make them more community-involving could also bring some more new ideas to the system.

From: jfarb

To: Coco
This Post:
00
199844.70 in reply to 199844.69
Date: 11/2/2011 5:22:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
556556
Agreed, for the most part yes, whats good for U21 isnt all that different from whats good for clubs. Perhaps I am letting NT matters cloud my opinion on U21. U21 guards especially are not going to go train past a point of declining returns. But a player like Hammond? Hes nearly 200k now. His manager could've stopped at 15/15/15 type primaries to keep his salary down and his value intact, and maybe gotten a few pops from subs in the process. However if he had done that, maybe we wouldn't be celebrating a Worlds gold right now. Which is why I generally agree with magiker's sentiment of focusing on primary training for U21 players. These are all general statements, we will always have some specialized players with unique goals and skills.

From: Isaiah

This Post:
00
199844.71 in reply to 199844.65
Date: 11/2/2011 5:26:58 PM
Smallfries
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Second Team:
Smallfries II
I really want to revisit my first question.

I think only magiker really got the jist of what I was asking. Obviously, we all want the best players in the best game shape and to leave spots open on the roster. However, everyone has 7 GS and a fixed starting point for their skills in week 1. Our first competitive game is in ~10 days, then we have 13(?) weeks of games.

So how do you plan on making good decisions in week 1 that last the season? What are some things you are going to look for and how are you going to find the answers?

Week one decisions will be based off of who the best players are at the time as well as potential. If a player is already capped I do not want him on the team to start. Also, I will be making decisions based on potential. If I have to choose between 2 guys, obe that is a little better but capped or another one that is a little worst than the first but better potential, then i would pick the second.I dont think i mentioned anything about GS in my other post about regarding the first 12 on the team but I may have.

This Post:
00
199844.72 in reply to 199844.70
Date: 11/2/2011 5:30:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
761761
You have said that you want to see more primaries on centers, and you have used Terrence Hammond as an example. Although Hammond was possibly the best player on the team last season, Jimmie Brown, arguably our best guard, shot 0-20 from 3. Due to the fact that we ran a LI offense last season, the big men will get more touches of the ball, and they will have more opportunites to kick the ball out to a guard for 3. Do you think that the low passing on some of the bigs we had caused such poor shooting performances from Jimmie Brown?

From: Isaiah

This Post:
00
199844.73 in reply to 199844.67
Date: 11/2/2011 5:33:06 PM
Smallfries
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Second Team:
Smallfries II
Most of you that are candidates have used the buzz phrase "further community involvement" within your speeches or answers to some of the questions. However I haven't heard a lot about HOW this could be accomplished. SO my questions is simple...If you think more community involvement is needed, HOW are you going to make this happen? Please don't use the token phrases "continue what we are doing" or "reach out to the community". I am very interested in specific ideas you have.


This is how im going to do it. If I am elected manager i plan on having several more contests and games to get more people involved. Jason started this with the U21 contest but I want to go even further in producing more events. Such events will make it even more competitive for owners to make an U21 player. I also plan on forming a rivaly contest. Who doesnt like rivalries? It would be a great way for owners to continue training and become active in the community.

This Post:
00
199844.75 in reply to 199844.51
Date: 11/2/2011 5:37:57 PM
Smallfries
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Second Team:
Smallfries II
And does anyone here believe in other tactics besides rng and li?

neutral? ptb? bo?

Do you believe in slow pace tactics a la jason running motion in nt?


Yes I believe in other tactics depending on our players as well as the defense we expect our opponent to run. Some offenses I may look into running are motion, PtB, LP.

This Post:
00
199844.77 in reply to 199844.72
Date: 11/2/2011 5:45:20 PM
Smallfries
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Second Team:
Smallfries II
You have said that you want to see more primaries on centers, and you have used Terrence Hammond as an example. Although Hammond was possibly the best player on the team last season, Jimmie Brown, arguably our best guard, shot 0-20 from 3. Due to the fact that we ran a LI offense last season, the big men will get more touches of the ball, and they will have more opportunites to kick the ball out to a guard for 3. Do you think that the low passing on some of the bigs we had caused such poor shooting performances from Jimmie Brown?


Im going to answer this too. The way I look at passing with the U21 team is it is always a plus if a big has passing. Could better passing on the bigs maybe have led to more baskets from Brown? Of course it could have but why take away from training the necessary primaries need to win just for a few extra points from Brown? In the end we may have scored less and lost more if we worried about that. So the wqy I look at it is if a center has good passing then its just a plus but im not going to tell someone to train passing for a few outside buckets instead of continue training one of the best U21 centers in the world.

This Post:
00
199844.78 in reply to 199844.76
Date: 11/2/2011 5:59:45 PM
Smallfries
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Second Team:
Smallfries II
I understand ur point on primaries, hence this question on secondaries.

If we LI, and we have a shooting guard that is the teams best shooter, and his driving is up to par, but has a 1 in inside shot and nothing special in passing, does he start? What do you think of inside shot for guards on a li?

Im going to answer this question as well. He does not start. I have continued to say it and believe it that IS does matter with guards. Of course it is easy to say it now because we don't know what we have in front of us just yet. I would love to have a guard playing with good passing and IS in a LI but if we do not have that option then we may have to play the guard you are talking about but I am a firm believer that IS does matter.

Advertisement