BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > No Look Inside for a season.

No Look Inside for a season.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
199504.69 in reply to 199504.61
Date: 11/23/2011 5:43:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
Or maybe you are totally wrong.
Don't blame you for not knowing how to use correctly 2-3 zone.


see the other side of that situation..how cool is that for LI teams that are user out there who tellin around that a fine defense option to stop ur/our offense isnt workin :-)

im pleased with that and sayin YES 23 is still BS..the only way to defend LI teams is using a 32 defense against it!!!!



Last edited by WillFreeman at 11/23/2011 5:47:34 AM

This Post:
00
199504.70 in reply to 199504.69
Date: 11/23/2011 7:39:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
Or maybe you are totally wrong.
Don't blame you for not knowing how to use correctly 2-3 zone.


see the other side of that situation..how cool is that for LI teams that are user out there who tellin around that a fine defense option to stop ur/our offense isnt workin :-)

im pleased with that and sayin YES 23 is still BS..the only way to defend LI teams is using a 32 defense against it!!!!



I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.

:D

This Post:
00
199504.71 in reply to 199504.70
Date: 11/23/2011 8:07:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.


I am of the same opinion. By playing 3-2 you put some pressure on outside players, effectively cutting some of their passing power and isolate their bigs on some extent. It's true you lose a bit on rebounding, but this is a minor sacrifice comparing to 2-3's non existing outside defense.


This Post:
00
199504.72 in reply to 199504.71
Date: 11/23/2011 8:40:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.


I am of the same opinion. By playing 3-2 you put some pressure on outside players, effectively cutting some of their passing power and isolate their bigs on some extent. It's true you lose a bit on rebounding, but this is a minor sacrifice comparing to 2-3's non existing outside defense.



Hope these ideas spread rapidly trough B3 teams.

I don't think the extra pressure on guards really pays off the monumental lack of ID you get with 3-2. Altough, if your ID is really lower than your opponents inside attack (this is the case where 2-3 is raped down the rim, without considering the extra assits and better outside scoring), you could say it's better to try 3-2. Since your big mens are gonna be outplayed no matter what, you can at least try to lose with better difference by stoping their guards (playing 3-2 against a decent team with superior inside attack is a lost game in my view).

Last edited by Zero, the Magi. at 11/23/2011 8:42:09 AM

This Post:
00
199504.73 in reply to 199504.72
Date: 11/23/2011 2:37:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Wait, wait...I didn't say I'd exclusively play 3-2 over M2M against LI teams. M2M is still the best option if you want to control who defends who. But if your inside players are stronger than his, I think 3-2 is a smart choice.

This Post:
00
199504.74 in reply to 199504.70
Date: 11/23/2011 4:04:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Or maybe you are totally wrong.
Don't blame you for not knowing how to use correctly 2-3 zone.


see the other side of that situation..how cool is that for LI teams that are user out there who tellin around that a fine defense option to stop ur/our offense isnt workin :-)

im pleased with that and sayin YES 23 is still BS..the only way to defend LI teams is using a 32 defense against it!!!!



I believe you are right! The ultimate defense against LI is 3-2, or M2M if you think your ID is high enough.

:D


don't forget about 1-3-1 much cooler then 3-2 against my LI ;)

This Post:
00
199504.75 in reply to 199504.73
Date: 11/23/2011 4:23:33 PM
Infested Warriors
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
775775
Wait, wait...I didn't say I'd exclusively play 3-2 over M2M against LI teams. M2M is still the best option if you want to control who defends who. But if your inside players are stronger than his, I think 3-2 is a smart choice.


I bet you defend M2M my LI... you have no chance.

Last edited by Mod-Infested at 11/23/2011 4:23:55 PM

This Post:
00
199504.77 in reply to 199504.75
Date: 11/24/2011 12:49:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Wait a bit man, first let me build my team and compete with the best in D.I and hopefully B3 one day...and then you will see if I have any chance or not

In the meantime, the best example I can offer you is this:

(39910796)

I normally don't play Low post (I'm a fan of PtB), but I didn't want to give him many possessions by playing a fast tactic and my offensive flow is good enough. Obviously not if you are checking Match ratings only, but that's because I played a 19y old trainee on PG.

Last edited by Koperboy at 11/24/2011 12:50:15 AM

This Post:
00
199504.78 in reply to 199504.76
Date: 11/24/2011 12:51:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Inside isolation? You mean Inside box-and-one?

This Post:
00
199504.79 in reply to 199504.78
Date: 11/24/2011 6:55:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
can u explain me one thing correctly? Whats wrong with 2-3?

to me it seems work well, same as 3-2...

in 3-2 u nad weaker ID and RB
in 2-3 u have weaker OD but better ID and RB

imo playing outside atack is good, becouse when your opponents try to stop u they need to play 3-2 and then they had weaker ID and RB. So u dont need very good C/F to have still RB and same lvl as your opponent.

for example

1) LI/3-2 vs 2) Motion/2-3

1 team need to have really good RB becouse they play 3-2, they 2) dont need to have good RB they recive bonus from 2-3.
and bonus to defense is same in 2-3 (to ID) and in 3-2 (to OD). So summary u have more bonuses from 2-3 than in 3-2.

if im wrong i will be glad if someone will explain it to me, whats really wrong with 2-3, why u are saing that its not working.


Advertisement