BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Tactics Poll

Tactics Poll

Set priority
Show messages by
From: yodabig

This Post:
11
197140.7 in reply to 197140.5
Date: 9/25/2011 11:32:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
What does having good GS have to do with it? Do any tactics work better if you have lousy GS?


Yes the ISO offences work just as well with lousy GS as they do with great GS, that is they suck all the time!

This Post:
00
197140.8 in reply to 197140.6
Date: 9/25/2011 11:56:56 PM
Carbó VB Ploiesti
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
147147
Perhaps you should have made two polls.

yap, thought about it, but that would have been too much :)
I chose RnG too... perhaps because I've used it the most and it worked very well under various circumstances...

From: myToast
This Post:
00
197140.9 in reply to 197140.8
Date: 9/26/2011 3:49:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727
BASE OFFENSE without doubt

i can score 80pts with my eye close

you think its too little? wait until u see me punch though +2 defense

From: Dodor
This Post:
00
197140.10 in reply to 197140.9
Date: 9/26/2011 6:33:54 AM
Dodor Utd
A Grupa
Overall Posts Rated:
495495
Second Team:
Dodor Inc
The Isolation tactics don't have a lot of fans apparently...

This Post:
00
197140.11 in reply to 197140.8
Date: 9/26/2011 8:50:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
Rng is the coolest, unfortunately doesn't always work. Especially against better teams.

Base offense is the perfect tactic when you begin, or chanmge league, there you can switch where you'll get more results. But it's boring, ven the name is boring, jaja =P

This Post:
00
197140.12 in reply to 197140.5
Date: 9/26/2011 8:59:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
Because if your best player who takes most of the shots has bad GS, your team will be terrible.

This Post:
00
197140.13 in reply to 197140.12
Date: 9/26/2011 9:47:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
172172
I think we all agree that good GS is better than bad GS... All I was saying is that your statement that your team has good GS is irrelevant for the choice of tactics.

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
197140.15 in reply to 197140.14
Date: 9/27/2011 1:22:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Hey again. I know some managers who have tried to specifically design their teams for specific offences which includes:

* obviously several teams with all high IS to play LI

* great passing teams that play motion

* teams with mismatches and good passing (so big men with great JS and JR as well as guards with great IS) so that they can play patient with great effect

* teams with great driving, passing, handling, IS and JS players to play motion - there was a famous team in Australia run by a female manager that exclusively ran it and was very sucessful

Most common by far is the LI option because the players needed are a dime a dozen and it is super easy to create and manage the team and because the supposed counter the 2/3 zone is busted (yes I know BB-Charles if we all had players with prodigious SB it would work fine but we don't).

This Post:
00
197140.16 in reply to 197140.15
Date: 9/27/2011 5:12:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i would rate OD at the big higher then SB for the 2-3, because i had some good succes with the 2-3 zone and no good shot blocker. And i don't say OD values in double digits.

Advertisement