BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Players Salaries

Players Salaries

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
80991.7 in reply to 80991.6
Date: 3/18/2009 2:26:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
ok but in 10 seasons there will be 10000 players who earn like 500k or more but only few clubs who can afford them unless every 4th division club has an arena of 100,000. so unattractive but expensive players will be on the market for very few money and newbies tend to buy those players. and by the next financial update they are bankrupt

This Post:
00
80991.8 in reply to 80991.7
Date: 3/18/2009 2:54:20 PM
Leones del Cinaruco
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
27092709
you should be able to afford the price of the player aswell as his first salary.
Then, more penalties will solve the problem? I don't think so.

Maybe in a further future the system will take measure of this market trouble.

This Post:
00
80991.9 in reply to 80991.7
Date: 3/20/2009 12:43:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
ok but in 10 seasons there will be 10000 players who earn like 500k or


I seriously doubt that.

Also, 99.9% of all such players will be useless, anyways (with only 1 or 2 very high skills). No serious team would bother to purchase them.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
80991.10 in reply to 80991.9
Date: 3/20/2009 12:49:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
i know but my suggestion isnt about serious teams. its about newbies who dont understand the game. theyll get attracted by those kind of players who are, when useless, very cheap to buy. but the new clubs cant afford the salary, maybe not even for the first week, so they will get bankrupt because they didtnt have to pay the first salary right away

This Post:
00
80991.11 in reply to 80991.10
Date: 3/20/2009 1:04:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
i know but my suggestion isnt about serious teams. its about newbies who dont understand the game. theyll get attracted by those kind of players who are, when useless, very cheap to buy. but the new clubs cant afford the salary, maybe not even for the first week, so they will get bankrupt because they didtnt have to pay the first salary right away


I still don't see the issue. When they realize their mistake, they can just fire them before the economic update and then they won't go bankrupt.

Besides, if they buy a player who they know is going to bankrupt their team, they kind of deserve what they get in my opinion.

Finally, the top salary in BB right now seems to be just under $200,000. I would be surprised if more than 5 players broke the $500,000 barrier next season.

Last edited by HeadPaperPusher at 3/20/2009 1:21:53 PM

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
80991.12 in reply to 80991.11
Date: 3/21/2009 12:11:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
i know but my suggestion isnt about serious teams. its about newbies who dont understand the game. theyll get attracted by those kind of players who are, when useless, very cheap to buy. but the new clubs cant afford the salary, maybe not even for the first week, so they will get bankrupt because they didtnt have to pay the first salary right away


I still don't see the issue. When they realize their mistake, they can just fire them before the economic update and then they won't go bankrupt.

Besides, if they buy a player who they know is going to bankrupt their team, they kind of deserve what they get in my opinion.

Finally, the top salary in BB right now seems to be just under $200,000. I would be surprised if more than 5 players broke the $500,000 barrier next season.

Great... does this mean in a few seasons we all race to buy uber monstrous players to help us out in a couple of games then fire them before the update?

I think it makes sense to add the salary at the point of purchase. This way new teams wont make the mistake of buying them and they wont be used for one off games.

This Post:
00
80991.13 in reply to 80991.12
Date: 3/21/2009 7:45:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
or we wait how high the salarys will bcome, and how high the income of the first one or two division become ;)

Maybe tere is still an market for the high salary players.

This Post:
00
80991.14 in reply to 80991.13
Date: 3/21/2009 9:29:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
or we wait how high the salarys will bcome, and how high the income of the first one or two division become ;)

Maybe tere is still an market for the high salary players.


The guy would have to be mega-rounded in his skill set to attract me..... I would need to be conviced what an extra 75k a week would get me over an almost triple wondrous C for 90-100k...

Guard wise.... again, JS/OD/DR/HD would need to be all Prodigious with Prominent PA/JR to tempt me to really shell out.....

I can imagine a specialist SF or PF added to a decent squad of conventional PG/SG/C's would be worth $150k a week in a very competitive league.

This Post:
00
80991.15 in reply to 80991.14
Date: 3/21/2009 12:25:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
What do you think about having the choice to stop training whenever we want to?

Like HT, wouldn't be a good idea to have an option that could help us in our future economy?

This Post:
00
80991.16 in reply to 80991.12
Date: 3/21/2009 2:52:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155

Great... does this mean in a few seasons we all race to buy uber monstrous players to help us out in a couple of games then fire them before the update?


I think if it ever came to this that a decision would need to be made. However, in the foreseeable future, I only see two scenarios:

1) The uber monster player is extremely rare and people will shell out big bucks to buy them.

or

2) The uber monster player has a high salary but is not really that useful to anyone's team because he only has one or two very high skills.



Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
80991.17 in reply to 80991.16
Date: 3/23/2009 10:06:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
1) The uber monster player is extremely rare and people will shell out big bucks to buy them.


And then their team will be crushed by the expense and eventually sell them off for a fraction of what they paid.

500k/week player, under the current economic conditions, is unsustainable. Even if it was a homegrown player that ended up costing 20% less, 400k is still unsustainable.

Maybe unsustainable is a bad choice of words, since some teams could afford to spend that much on one player. Though, it'd be a terrible decision to carry a 400k player and then spend a small portion of that one players salary on the rest of your team.

Have to assume the player ends up with a farm team or bounces around the TL over and over after teams that can't afford them buy them for low prices and then go bot.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Advertisement