BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Money at the end of the sale

Money at the end of the sale

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Milly

To: RiP
This Post:
00
88152.9 in reply to 88152.8
Date: 5/6/2009 3:45:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
But on the other hand, if you use your "money" on one player, and a better one is for sale the day you sold your own. Then you miss the better one? To me looks like a marginal problem connected closely to fortune!

Older than the rest ...
This Post:
00
88152.10 in reply to 88152.7
Date: 5/6/2009 10:06:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
where not talking about early bids at all here. Where talking about being allowed to use that money. If players were not bidding on their friends players early so they go up in price or they can buy another player with this money is one thing. But it happens quite early and i have a hard time imagining that if a player jumps up early in price and he continues to go up by the end of his trading and never really went over his market value that it would be noticed.

I once saw a player being sold for more money then someone i just bought and he got the money on the first day and the player price never changed. That owner then bought someone a few hours later with the money he got from an over priced player and the team that bought him just happened to be from the same country.

I don't believe in coincidence like this.

If you don't have the money in hand so you cant buy a player that is the decision on deciding how to use your money in the best way. I don't feel you should get an advantage by selling a player and then start using that money when the player is still on your team.

In some case you can buy a new player and still have your old player available for the same game. Either you should not receive the money till the player is sold or you cant play with a player while he is on the transfer market.

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
88152.11 in reply to 88152.10
Date: 5/6/2009 10:43:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
You're right that - if someone (really) overbids i.e. cheats and those extra money are crucial for getting a player with a near deadline so even if this overbid is reported the receiver still got the desired player, right? - this is a problem.
The simillar problem is that nt-like players from banned teams should not hit TL but BB didn't want to deal with that.

This Post:
00
88152.13 in reply to 88152.12
Date: 5/6/2009 1:49:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
whats weird. That i think they should not retain the money till they are transfered.

That is my opinion nothing weird about it. I am not telling people when or on who to place their bids. I am asking for something to happen that i and a few others here thing is better for the game and in my opinion a bit more fair.

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
88152.15 in reply to 88152.14
Date: 5/6/2009 4:18:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
I can understand why. But after playing int his game for multiple seasons and seeing how some teams play and how they use other teams to help the is unacceptable to me. I believe that BB needs ti implement some changes for the benefit of the game such as this.

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
From: HJB

To: Ehud
This Post:
00
88152.16 in reply to 88152.1
Date: 5/11/2009 8:25:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i don't think so .

because the people who offer the deal can not withdraw , the money goes nowhere but my pocket . so there is no reason for the BB to hold it .

if BB wants to hold it , provide withdraw with this change .


From: docend24

To: HJB
This Post:
00
88152.17 in reply to 88152.16
Date: 5/11/2009 10:26:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Your argument doesn't make any sense. If you want a reality comparison, let say third party (comitee, jury, anything) keeps the money until bidding is over. Something like if owe money (in RL) and he/she/it refuses to receive the filling from you.

Withdraws are very bad idea in general.

Advertisement