BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Remove possibility to play TIE

Remove possibility to play TIE

Set priority
Show messages by
From: brian

To: Coco
This Post:
00
125223.71 in reply to 125223.70
Date: 1/8/2010 11:19:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Right, and you can already get special physio treatment for you players with the massage trainer specialty.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
125223.72 in reply to 125223.31
Date: 1/11/2010 12:49:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
. Try to look at that thing by this way - how many times anybody usually get by "accident" TIE game on both sides? The probability that you will TIE and the other team do the same is quite small.



This is absolutely false. I have NEVER arranged a mutual TIE, yet it happens all of the time in my league games. Managing enthusiasm is part of the game, and if two players do it well, it doesnt imply collusion not one bit.

Take it Easy is a term many people have a problem with, it implies no effort at all. Change from TIE, Norm, and CT to Trying hard, trying really hard, and trying really really hard and half of these arguments are moot.

This Post:
00
125223.73 in reply to 125223.72
Date: 1/11/2010 4:10:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
but the fact that there is collusion is really not speaking for TIE. still if people email each other to play normal, i think that's using the power of the enthusiasm in a negative unfair way.

i think enthusiasm is way too overrated anyways in this game, and would vote for giving more tactical options for coaches and give then tactics more importance and more impact than enthusiasm.

This Post:
00
125223.74 in reply to 125223.1
Date: 1/13/2010 2:51:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i think we can use TIE in a game but not consecutively. as ive seen last season PO contenders TIE their last 5 games. in reality i think a team wont play easy 5 consecutive games so they can get superstrong later.

From: pudussu
This Post:
00
125223.75 in reply to 125223.74
Date: 1/17/2010 3:56:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
A first simple thing to do is remove the sentence concerning enthusiam in the game sum-up. Then nobody can know if there effectivly was a TIE.
And people can't verify if their opponent has respected the Mutual TIE.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
125223.77 in reply to 125223.75
Date: 1/17/2010 7:34:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
and people start to wonder over results even more

This Post:
00
125223.78 in reply to 125223.72
Date: 1/17/2010 12:37:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Take it Easy is a term many people have a problem with, it implies no effort at all. Change from TIE, Norm, and CT to Trying hard, trying really hard, and trying really really hard and half of these arguments are moot.

This is absolutely wrong. It is a poor (to say the least) and unrealistic system, and changing names doesn't change that fact.

The beuaty with BB is that most parts of the game is actually pretty logical and "feels" very much basketball. This means that if you know (and master) basketball tactics you can actually manage your team quite well without reading the manual (except for understanding how training works). The enthusiasm mechanism though, has nothing (or at least very little) to do with basketball reality, but a lot to do with Hattrick "reality". Changing denominations doesn't change that.



Last edited by chespirito at 1/17/2010 12:38:03 PM

This Post:
00
125223.79 in reply to 125223.78
Date: 1/17/2010 11:13:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
Your opinion is duly noted