BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Highest Experience

Highest Experience

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
173377.70 in reply to 173377.69
Date: 3/9/2011 5:46:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414


Play a slow paced offence where your player doesn't drive much for shots. Princeton is a good one as is patient. Kinda hard to mess wtih your pace and such with X factor considered.

Play the player for 48 minutes every single game without stop. You can train GS or fitness or something to off set it. Bottom line the more minutes the more experience. This makes it hard to win anc play in competitive games of course.

Basically to have expereinced players you have to lose games? -.-"


LOL

From: Sparkle

To: RiP
This Post:
00
173377.72 in reply to 173377.71
Date: 3/9/2011 10:42:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
One of the problems is the almost insignificant difference of exp given between NT games and normal league games. And should Div I league games give more exp than Div V?

This Post:
00
173377.73 in reply to 173377.72
Date: 3/10/2011 8:14:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
One of the problems is the almost insignificant difference of exp given between NT games and normal league games. And should Div I league games give more exp than Div V?


i think the nt games are a problem, but div 5 games should give the same like the ones in div 1 if you ask me.

This Post:
00
173377.74 in reply to 173377.73
Date: 3/11/2011 1:18:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Again I agree with GM-CrazyEye. Shouldn't matter what league a guy is in. And playing more should give you more experience, not having properly managed minutes. As far as NT games go, i don't see why they should give such a big bonus.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
22
173377.75 in reply to 173377.74
Date: 3/11/2011 1:40:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
Again I agree with GM-CrazyEye. Shouldn't matter what league a guy is in. And playing more should give you more experience, not having properly managed minutes. As far as NT games go, i don't see why they should give such a big bonus.


Because an NBA superstar with 5 championship rings and has represented his country at the Olympics should rightfully have more experience than a Division 5 scrub that has played in his local league all his life?

In this sense, the experience system is flawed.

I would like to see extra experience awarded with winning the Tournament, or winning the division (Higher divisions offer bigger exp payout) and such. Tournament finals, Division playoff tiebreakers for the title, NT finals, all these offer a unique experience that the ordinary scrub will never obtain. And this way, the best players, playing at the top level and challenging for honors, will hold the best experience.

This Post:
00
173377.76 in reply to 173377.75
Date: 3/11/2011 1:55:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
The game should be equal for all and you don't deserve even more prizes.

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
This Post:
00
173377.77 in reply to 173377.76
Date: 3/11/2011 2:16:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
The game should be equal for all and you don't deserve even more prizes. :)


To your first statement, the game IS equal for all. The latter....nothing I can comment on that. Was hoping for some open discussion on the current experience system rather than and evaluation on who is more deserving of prizes.

This Post:
00
173377.78 in reply to 173377.77
Date: 3/11/2011 3:09:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
I don't think the bigger teams need to get bigger at a faster rate than others.

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
This Post:
00
173377.79 in reply to 173377.75
Date: 3/11/2011 3:14:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Again I agree with GM-CrazyEye. Shouldn't matter what league a guy is in. And playing more should give you more experience, not having properly managed minutes. As far as NT games go, i don't see why they should give such a big bonus.


Because an NBA superstar with 5 championship rings and has represented his country at the Olympics should rightfully have more experience than a Division 5 scrub that has played in his local league all his life?

In this sense, the experience system is flawed.

I would like to see extra experience awarded with winning the Tournament, or winning the division (Higher divisions offer bigger exp payout) and such. Tournament finals, Division playoff tiebreakers for the title, NT finals, all these offer a unique experience that the ordinary scrub will never obtain. And this way, the best players, playing at the top level and challenging for honors, will hold the best experience.


with the olympics we agree, but also games at low level could be close and tricky. Yes the player have weaker skills, but there are also amateur veterans - and it is also bad to the game design in my eyes if top teams get to much advanatages.

Experience wise, you should learn the most when you are a little big weaker then your opponents, so your olypic star would be bored and won't learn anything when he play in division five against players who can not stop him. Maybe the same happens with the 18 year old rookie, who plays top division against a player like him he would get more frustrated then learning the dirty tricks to beat his competion.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 3/11/2011 3:17:01 AM

This Post:
00
173377.80 in reply to 173377.75
Date: 3/11/2011 11:49:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
should rightfully have more experience than a Division 5 scrub that has played in his local league all his life?


Why?

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
Advertisement