BuzzerBeater Forums

Mate, come on... Like you've never seen those. They are totally screwed.

I dunno what you have checked but 18 yo HoFs with 55+ TSP (1-2 RB) were deemed to be worth 200-300k a couple of weeks ago. I bought several of those for this kind of money. Sahand bought pretty much the same players for 1.5-2.5 million. The tr. price estimate is way more impactful for new managers than some 50-100k DT profit made on their behalf. Especially since you will not reimburse them (I presume) with the amount taken from the "day-trader".

The algorithm for developed players says more than 85 outside TSP as the ceiling. We have 120 outside TSP players nowadays... There's a huge difference not taken into account by any means. And that's the smallest problem. How is "outside" TSP even relevant? Is OD worth as much as JR/HN?? How is "inside" TSP relevant, especially for guards? Is IS/ID worth as much as RB/SB for them?

This thing needs a complete overhaul. Period.

Edit: One more important thing to add: The current algorithm doesn't take into account what part of the season we are currently in at all. Which is tremendously important for younger players. This is the key reason behind the transfer estimates being wildly inaccurate for fresh draftees (as it compares them to the skill-sets of recently sold players (who are now 19, not 18 for example) and it harms newer managers mostly.

Last edited by mink0ff at 5/11/2022 10:51:10 AM

Im just saying, that for our subject right here - it works, and it doesn't help at all.

I can agree to that.

Fact Check: You did it yourself with (50770361). Bought for 30k, sold for 400k after 10 days.

Oh gush....Alonso, with all respect to you. Leave financials, please. You completely don't understand how economy behaves.

Does that mean his worth is 400k in the moment of sale? No..his worth is 10k at best.

Yes, he is worth 400k in the moment of sale. You know why? I explain you. Because, I'm not a charity, but I try to make bussiness. This price include my costs: 49% of taxes (abolish taxes then price will be 49% lower) and cost of storing (around 40k per week for 9 youngsters) + my cost of gym (15k per week, and cost of building). He was worth 30k in time when supply in youngster was the biggest on the market. You had also possibility to buy him as everybody. Why he should be worth 10k now, when is lack of perspective youngsters on the market? Could you explain me? Oh, well. I understand: Probably you expect I should sell player below my costs because you want to keep new users? I'm afraid you will faster lose current users than acguire new ones doing such changes;-)

First of all, player is worth as much as somebody want to pay for hiim and it's not cheating...until two teams aren't in collusion. I'm not a cheater. I simply try to do fair business, while you called me cheater because you don't understand a basis of economy. Believe me or not as you wish (you can check it, if you want): I haven't any connections with buying teams. Furthermore, this team (50770361) isn't newbie. He has played since 38 season.

By the way: Do you think top trainers are worth 3 millions? Is it fair price? I think you should do something with this.

First of all, player is worth as much as somebody want to pay for hiim and it's not cheating...until two teams aren't in collusion. I'm not a cheater. I simply try to do fair business...

That.

After looking at Poland's D1 transfer list as well as some other teams that engage in this behavior, I think your only real argument for doing this is that you are smarter when it comes to what a player is worth than other users and are taking advantage of their lack of knowledge of what similar players are selling for on the market. Personally, I don't think this is very healthy for the game or for new users.

I've found the type of transfers that I believe they are targeting and these are not the case of a player increasing in value from training or selling at a hot time on the market. They are buying high potential prospects without great skills for their age (so they buy cheap) and then listing them at a much higher price until finally an inexperienced team buys them not knowing they can get better players for much cheaper.

So if you are going to argue in favor of this, then tell it for what it is. You're taking advantage of less knowledgeable teams who don't understand the value of a player like you do. Your explanation for the cost of keeping the player is pretty ridiculous and I think you know that since you apparently factored in storing 8 other youngsters as the price of holding that one player.

I guarantee, if they listed them for $1 and, really, I mean really, let the market decide their value, they wouldn't be selling for 100 and 100ks of dollars. These players are not in bid wars at the high price. its 1 bid, then sold to the unknown buyer. But hey, lets not be honest here. Lets go hide behind the guise of "real market value." lmao (and YOU DON'T KNOW!) :-$

I will give you the solution.

For every young player, make an estimation of final SOS if trained every week until 28 given his current SOS, potential and age.

For example, a player with very high potential but very low SOS and already 21, could say while on sale
"Predicted final SOS: 105"

You're welcome.

taking advantage of their lack of knowledge of what similar players are selling for on the market.

Try to buy 19yo players with potential hof on the market currently and you will see how small is a choice now.

Generally, I think the game is about using knowledge and gain advantages: tactical, strategical, economical. Am I wrong? Is it cheating?

Everybody can do the same, then business would completely die. Why you don't do it? I guess because it demands a lot of time. So you don't have time or don't want to spend your time on it. It's easier to be against and prohibit all creative or smart possibilities of earining money to equal chances of really active users with non-active or semi-active Of course, much more "creativity" is tanking and taking money for nothing. This kind of "activity" will develop this game for sure

I think you know that since you apparently factored in storing 8 other youngsters as the price of holding that one player

How did you count this, my genius of math?

Agreed here.

The idea being that what Poland D1 is doing has nothing to do with real transfer list value changing over 10 days (because we know it's not that volatile). Even at high and low activity times you're not gonna see a +3,333% difference in market pricing in those times within that short of a period.

This is seen also because there was no market competition on your player that sold for 400k. There was 1 bid by 1 manager, that's it. I can go on and bid 400k for a player on the TL, does that mean they are worth 400k, no.