Well, as many people know, I have always been a fan of shot blocking. Unfortunately I never got the time to finish my shot blocking study to see how much each pop of shot blocking effected the opponent's field goal percentage. However, I think the way to stop LI kind of gets into the way of playing a LI offense.
See, if the price of SB doesn't go down much, and bigs continue to have ridiculous salaries with all primaries, then the only way to do it is by taking away other primaries on bigs in order to have SB. The question though, what do you subtract?
You can't subtract rebounding because we all know how important that is. We can't subtract IS, especially if we run a LI offense. Could we subtract ID? Well, maybe depending on how effective SB becomes.
If we subtract IS let's say, to add more SB, then we will struggle running the LI. I know others will say our guards can make up for it, but I'm just not sure.
Personally the way I look at it is if you add to our defense to stop the LI, we will almost be forced to try something else on offense.
So, as I say right now, I think we are built for the LI just ecause that will give us the best chances to win. But if we want to be able to stop the LI we might be forced into something else.
Ultimately, I think we need to turn our bigs into more of a PF type. PFs usually cost less (salary wise) and also benefit club teams as well. This could be one option to keep bigs' salaries down. Of course it would be hard to make all bigs PFs, but it's an option to tell everyone when they train them.