Even though I clearly benefited from HCA, I still have no problem asking...
....Why isn't B3 all on neutral court? I've never heard one good reason why HCA is even a factor!
Has anyone ever heard a good reason? Did I miss it?
it should give small teams chanches to kick the strong teams out so that tteams didn't dominate, maybe not the best reasons but at least it works ;)
Why should we give smaller teams chance to upset big ones in B3 where we are looking for the best team? Anyway my proposal of new B3 system would almost eliminate the HCA and random factor. As i wrote earlier i suggest 11 week system with 2 single elimination rounds to make 64 best teams compete as fair as possible in group stage with neutral areanas. Top 32 ranked teams i would devide into 16 groups and draw the rest randomly. After 3 group games top 2 teams would advance to next group stage withe 8 pools of 4 and again i would seed 16 previous group winners. After these 3 games just winner would advance to play quartetfinals withe best teams HCA. Final four would be again at neutral place. I think it much more reasonable and less random system.
1 BBB, 20 Leagues, 10 Tournaments, 3 Europe Titles (SVK), 2 World Bronzes (SVK), 2 Europe Bronzes (SVK,FRA), 42 Seasons NT coaching