BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Make place 3-5 more attractive

Make place 3-5 more attractive

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
22
156862.73 in reply to 156862.72
Date: 9/24/2010 4:34:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I can imagine even harder conditions for walkovers:
- automatic relegation for every team with any walkover (either one level down or to the bottom level)
- in draft order first teams without walkover and behind them all teams with any walkover
- no training at all for the week with walkover

Way way way way way too harsh! Some teams have accidental walkovers by not setting a lineup or some other accident. Doesn't mean they should get no training, get last draft pick and get automatically relegated.

This Post:
00
156862.74 in reply to 156862.73
Date: 9/24/2010 7:17:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
about the training thing i could discuss, i don't think it is to hard but i believe thats another topic ;)

And about the draft thing, i want at least a reversed order with the tie breaker, so that you don't profit from forfeiting a game, i suggested that here -> (157654.1)

This Post:
00
156862.75 in reply to 156862.74
Date: 9/24/2010 7:39:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
As a tie breaker I completely agree.

This Post:
11
156862.76 in reply to 156862.73
Date: 9/24/2010 10:22:22 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12031203
Second Team:
Jirkov
Every team can set default lineup. There is no way for accidental walkover if he set it.

Last edited by rwystyrk at 9/24/2010 10:22:40 AM

This Post:
00
156862.77 in reply to 156862.76
Date: 9/24/2010 10:43:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Every team can set default lineup. There is no way for accidental walkover if he set it.


could but must not ;) And let give us a sitution liek hattrick before some weeks, the server crashed for two days, and many teams have forgotten their cup lineup even when there is a standard lineup too.

This Post:
00
156862.78 in reply to 156862.76
Date: 9/24/2010 10:45:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Actually that isn't quite correct. For example, the last time I set my "standard" lineup was weeks ago. However since then there have been multiple changes to my roster. So if a team hasn't set a default lineup recently and they have had roster changes then it is quite easy for them to not set a lineup and have a walkover.

This Post:
00
156862.79 in reply to 156862.78
Date: 9/24/2010 10:49:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
but you should change 8 players at minimum to your lineup, to cause default lineup to be less than 3 players. so if you're doing such a major change, please be kind and keep in mind to set default lineup when you're finished. this would be a stupid excuse "i sold and bought players, so i didn't set default lineup"...

From: Rycka
This Post:
00
156862.80 in reply to 156862.79
Date: 9/24/2010 10:55:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
on topic. if you still feel that this needs to be fixed, even if it isn't broken, how about just giving one relegation game for 6th and 7th place instead of a series until 2 wins?

This Post:
00
156862.81 in reply to 156862.80
Date: 9/24/2010 11:51:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
on topic. if you still feel that this needs to be fixed, even if it isn't broken, how about just giving one relegation game for 6th and 7th place instead of a series until 2 wins?


I think that makes it way too harsh for 6th and 7th. Too many people will be unluckily relegating.

Simply having no salary to pay during the offseason would solve all these problems.

This Post:
00
156862.82 in reply to 156862.81
Date: 9/24/2010 11:58:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
Simply having no salary to pay during the offseason would solve all these problems.


woudn't it be more of a bonus for finishing 5th not 4th? 4th place if they lost first po game would be in disadvantage, wouldn't it?

unless you mean that all 8 teams would have no salary to pay in offseason. but would it be logical? all season you have to pay, and when its time for most important matches, your players are playing for free.

Last edited by Rycka at 9/24/2010 12:00:05 PM

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
156862.83 in reply to 156862.82
Date: 9/24/2010 12:03:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
unless you mean that all 8 teams would have no salary to pay in offseason. but would it be logical? all season you have to pay, and when its time for most important matches, your players are playing for free.


and it wouldn't change anything, but probadly he mean that you don't pay salary when you are finished with your regular games.

Advertisement