BuzzerBeater Forums

[Sigh...]

I know im going to be shunned for this, but...

Radford was no more effective than any $100k player since meateors had such weak inside players. Since radfords salary was $360k, your merchandise would have to be around $260k higher than normal to justify it... Also you tell someone about how bad it is to not make a weekly profit, yet you ran at a loss to beat a team who had $217k in salaries. Without radford you still would have won and banked a 6 figure profit for the week, but you give someone else advice about financial matters...

Why do you still try to justify it? Do you really not understand?

I never tried to justify that buying radford was a good idea. In case you forget, I agreed with you about but buying such players as a bad idea. You keep try to make people believe that i did it intentionally when I obviously didn't. I know that even 2 50k players instead one, 100k player would have been better. In case you forget, I did say if meat doesn't buy any inside players, I'm a chance. You figuered it was all to do with Radfored. Wrong! I knew what I was suppose to do, and despite that, tried to sell Radford, cause I knew that I did not need him. I have never tried to argue your points. I have only tried to answer your questions and yet that is never good enough for you. You then go on to insult my intelligence by trying to pass of your opions as facts, and then denying ever doing so. Then you go to say. " If someone tells me I have no idea what I am talking about when I explain why I'm 100% correct, that is when an argument is incited". You were never 100% correct about most thing as you hadn't and could never proove you were. Seriously, you need to let go and get over youself.

When I tried helping fish out with my opion, I based it on a few seasons ago for starters. Instead of you adding to that with your own opinion possitively, you just thought, 'hey, what a great opportunity to give him more shit'. Instead, you simply could have said, hey i disagree, and here is what i think would be better. However, you just went on questioning that whole Radford thing.

Why do you still try to justify it? Do you really not understand?

Why are you even still trying to win a poinless arguement? Obviously you dont understand shit and just keep trying to justify your points when in reallity, you are just useless in doing so.

One more thing, just like in your last post to me in s18, not gonna respond cause you are just typing too much bs. So say what you believe is true, and offend me in any way. Unless you buy a dictionary and figure out what fact actually means, then there is no point in responding to anything you have to say.

Gota love a good win with 48 less rebounds than your opponent :)

lol that is one of the oddest games ever

but poor jw that is a sucky way 2 start

some of these promoted teams r really hardcore

I never tried to justify that buying radford was a good idea. In case you forget, I agreed with you about but buying such players as a bad idea. You keep try to make people believe that i did it intentionally when I obviously didn't.

No, you tried saying that you were so drunk that you logged into bb and made an unconscious decision to purchase him. What you continue to try to justify is keeping him at the incredible waste of salary by playing down your losses and now by claiming the extra merch revenue limited the damage...

In case you forget, I did say if meat doesn't buy any inside players, I'm a chance. You figuered it was all to do with Radfored. Wrong! I knew what I was suppose to do, and despite that, tried to sell Radford, cause I knew that I did not need him.

No. You purchased other players because you realised he wouldn't be enough. You never once tried to sell radford. You even said you were holding onto him until you could get more for him, which is when I explained how much you were losing in salary. If you didn't think you needed a $360k player you would have sold him immediately... You waited 5 weeks at a loss of $1.79 million and claimed it was only 200k...

You were never 100% correct about most thing as you hadn't and could never proove you were.

Feel free to use examples (with evidence) of when i was incorrect... The fact you can't prove anything you say only validates what I say!

However, you just went on questioning that whole Radford thing.

No, I asked how much profit you were making. Admittedly i pointed out in the question that you had one player worth a lot more than your opponents whole roster, but you chose to try and defend having him by claiming he only cost you 200k and that you were never in the red, even though both statements were false...

Why are you even still trying to win a poinless arguement? Obviously you dont understand shit and just keep trying to justify your points when in reallity, you are just useless in doing so.

It's not about winning the argument. There is no argument to win anymore. I won that last season... You say I don't understand shit and that I'm trying to justify my point, yet all I am doing is pointing out your incorrect statements and providing proven logic to justify it. If it is me who doesn't understand shit, why is it you are the one making false claims?

One more thing, just like in your last post to me in s18, not gonna respond cause you are just typing too much bs.

If you don't intend on bring anything factual that can back up what you say, I think that's for the best...

Last edited by Pablo Ignatio Montoya at 2/14/2012 8:34:32 AM

Marmots with a 100% winning record!

That hasn't happened for a while...

Gota love a good win with 48 less rebounds than your opponent

Why FCP? Were his guards really that bad?

dejavu much? you'll prolly get 22-0 then get knocked out in the first round of the PO hahaha

Well he did have 36 TO's and only 3 steals, so I guess it was effective??

That's what I'm expecting, too. If fishy knows what's good for him, he'll let me win the next game so that history repeats. If he beats me so I can't go 22-0, I'm basically 100% guaranteed to promote to ABBL.

Well he did have 36 TO's and only 3 steals, so I guess it was effective??

Yeah probably true. But he might've shot 30 something % from the field instead of just under 42% if you had played m2m.