BuzzerBeater Forums

start bs training

Nope, don't need it on higher lvl then now.

I hope you will train SB and win the Polska League

start bs training

Nope, don't need it on higher lvl then now.

Then you should stop complaining that the 2-3 zone doesn't work. :)

You know what are you talking about?

I had this discussion, no reason to repeat it again. 2-3 must be stronger.

Hmm all your experience is a quote from BB-Patrick? You think all what you read is exactly so?

How can you explain then that 95% (lets say) good managers (and NT teams) play in almost all their games LI? I will tell you why, because its OP (over power)

I have experimented as i said, in 1st League of my country, 6-8 seasons with NT, 4 seasons in B3, in a PL and etc, a normal team can't have all skills to stop this, they just need to fix that 2-3 zone to work better, or we will be playing in the future a game called LI Beater.

I have no problem with that, have a strong LI team, own in my country, but its too funny when someone like you tell that the 2-3 is normal in function. I've run 2-3 successfully in B3 and I still say that this zone is too week.

You think you can have high IS ID RB SB.. on your 2 Bigs? Yep if you can pay a salary for one player around 300k or more, than it would be easy, we all could stop the LI easy.

Regards

I hope you read part "You will have to have the players to play a tactic effectively".

You think you can have high IS ID RB SB.. on your 2 Bigs? Yep if you can pay a salary for one player around 300k or more, than it would be easy, we all could stop the LI easy.

It is the most common argument in shotblocking debate. Maybe there is no need to have such high IS or RB (maybe guards could have higher?). Remember 1 IS pop up = 2 SB pop up in salary and potential.

OK , I read your post carefully and I have some question.

Why do you play with your NT LI tactics?
Play Outside tactics with those C that are you talking about, low IS and bigger SB RB and ID?
What have you done with your club with that training?

All that what are you talking about is nice, but why do this if I have success with an other strategy? Honestly I build my team so as the Engine works, buy players for that tactics that works, and play them, I can say that isn't bad for me, in last 3-4 seasons i got 1 Cup and 2 Titles in my Country.

In last 3 seasons I lost 1 regular match in League, so the score is 65-1, would you honestly change your style of play, would you buy defensive players with higher SB? Would you change your style of playing?
I don't go just with Inside tactics, but they are the most efficient, and if you say that's not true, you are wrong.

So my arguments don't fail in practice. I have success like other teams that play the similar style. What have you done with your team with those other style of playing, win a 3rd League of your country? Other players should play so and build their teams so? I guess not.
No hard feelings, you just need more experience.

Coming back to the salary cap I'm against it, I think this is the only way to "force" teams of small countries to waste some money. Having a salary cap means to give them possibility to collect a lot of money every season. Leaving the salary free it can happens that this kind of teams will win the BBB but then they have to stay "hidden" for few seasons.

So my arguments don't fail in practice. I have success like other teams that play the similar style. What have you done with your team with those other style of playing, win a 3rd League of your country? Other players should play so and build their teams so? I guess not.
No hard feelings, you just need more experience.

Right on! Man was successful riding on horseback and everyone did it with great success. Why would anyone bother inventing the automobile or airplane? Just complain to your horse breeders if you don't like their speed, since there's no reason whatsoever to try something other than what has been proven to work.