Hi guys. I have a question regarding tactics. Does it have any influence how often you play with one particular tactic on mastering this certain tactic by your team? If i didnt express myself correctly, my question is i.e. when you play 90% with Look Inside and then you switch to RnG or Motion very seldom, even though you have very good shooters your numbers (and %) of 3pt shooting isnt good to say the least. What i paid attention to my league is that the teams that play outside tactics more often or almost always, have very good stats even though their players are not that great in JS or jump range for example. I had games last season, when i chose RnG or princeton and teams defended 2-3 my team was shooting under 30% from 3pt line. I had a guy with 26-20 JS/JR and 20/20 HA/DR on sg most of the time, still the numbers were awful compared to the other teams who played outside tactics and attacking even 3-2 zones had better numbers than me attacking 2-3 zone.
(124662165)barely won this game in finals (% was not that bad, but considering 2-3 zone not that good)
(124662164)lost without a chance, % too low considering 2-3 zone again
(123801008)18%, nothing to say
(123800977)29%, my SG with 26/20 JS/JR with 38.8% FG against 35yrs old 35K player
(123800969)28% and the same player 12.5% from 3pt (1/8) and 5/15 (33%) FG against 60K player, insane i guess
(123800961)another insane game. me defending princeton with 3-2 zone and attacking opponents 2-3 zone with RnG. Hes shooting 57% (16/28) from 3pt line, me going 11/29 (28%), my sg with 9/22 fg and 3/12 3pt (25%).
(124526127)also losing cup final like that. (opponent played ct in semis and i pleyed normal in semis, so though he played ct in final, i had higher enth)
I know in several cases teams played with more attitude, but still, the numbers are unexplainable for me.
Anyone any idea?
Last edited by GM-Perpete at 5/30/2023 11:41:00 AM