BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Wrong formation/enthusiasm used

Wrong formation/enthusiasm used

Set priority
Show messages by
From: MJ

This Post:
00
26712.735 in reply to 26712.734
Date: 12/25/2012 8:34:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
No, If you want to get ~36-12 minutes (starter-back up), you've got to use strictly follow...! ;)
I'm not a very amateur manager, just take a lo0k at my games and you'll find i usually use coach picks from the depth chart and depth chart until 4th and I have full control over my minutes and wins. better to say I had ;) I know how much might my players play while i'm setting the line up, oh sorry, I knew ;)

my problem is not how to work with coach authority, my problem is how they used to work and how they do. I know you are trying to correct the bugs ASAP, and I appreciate that. so, I sit back and enjoy strictly follow and wait to hear other options are correct.

This Post:
00
26712.736 in reply to 26712.734
Date: 12/27/2012 3:44:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
135135
If you want more control over your minutes, you've got to use strictly follow...

ok, just a question then:
In this game (52703966)

i did use strictly follow depth chart, but trenton funk just played 3 minutes. He was set as a reserve at sf and is a better player then the one which played as starter- so why did he just play 3 minutes? Does this mean, that i don´t even have control over my minutes when i use strictly follow depth chart ?

This Post:
00
26712.737 in reply to 26712.736
Date: 12/27/2012 7:23:29 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36073607
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
In games where you lose most of the time, your coach will try and keep the starters in the game as long as possible in order to catch up, believing you've set the best possible players as starters. This is nothing unusual.

This Post:
00
26712.738 in reply to 26712.736
Date: 12/30/2012 4:04:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
If you want more control over your minutes, you've got to use strictly follow...

ok, just a question then:
In this game (52703966)

i did use strictly follow depth chart, but trenton funk just played 3 minutes. He was set as a reserve at sf and is a better player then the one which played as starter- so why did he just play 3 minutes? Does this mean, that i don´t even have control over my minutes when i use strictly follow depth chart ?


Did you set Gocke as Back up but Funk & Oser as Reserve?

Last edited by MJ at 12/30/2012 4:11:22 AM

This Post:
00
26712.739 in reply to 26712.738
Date: 12/30/2012 3:55:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
135135
If you want more control over your minutes, you've got to use strictly follow...

ok, just a question then:
In this game (52703966)

i did use strictly follow depth chart, but trenton funk just played 3 minutes. He was set as a reserve at sf and is a better player then the one which played as starter- so why did he just play 3 minutes? Does this mean, that i don´t even have control over my minutes when i use strictly follow depth chart ?


Did you set Gocke as Back up but Funk & Oser as Reserve?



Sorry, i haven't made my statement properly:
lütfüh nezih was set as a starter, his backup was trenton funk and reserve was again lütfüh nezih. this setup was made for every position except my training position. As i said before, I really can't understand, why trennton funk, a player who is much better than lütfüh nezih, receives just 3minutes playing time, when i play strictly follow depth chart. i would expect at least 12 minutes, but if this is normal, i may have to adapt my tactic. So thanks marin.

This Post:
00
26712.740 in reply to 26712.739
Date: 12/30/2012 5:06:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
So it leads to a new question: why Oser and Funk played only 3 minutes but Gocke played 12?
Gocke is far weaker than his Starter, Also Wippel had played well, no foul and no injury.
the answer is somewhere among stamina, tactic and bug!

would you tell us how much are wippel's and nezih's staminas?

This Post:
00
26712.741 in reply to 26712.740
Date: 1/1/2013 1:13:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
135135
So it leads to a new question: why Oser and Funk played only 3 minutes but Gocke played 12?
Gocke is far weaker than his Starter, Also Wippel had played well, no foul and no injury.
the answer is somewhere among stamina, tactic and bug!

would you tell us how much are wippel's and nezih's staminas?


good questions:

wippel has a 4 and nezih has a 7 in stamina- which could be an explanation....

This Post:
00
26712.742 in reply to 26712.741
Date: 1/3/2013 5:02:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
so it can explain the difference of minutes, however I think 4 is not low enough for this difference and would rather see 1 or 2 for him.

This Post:
00
26712.743 in reply to 26712.737
Date: 3/21/2013 10:09:52 PM
Milwaukee Lethargy
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
Second Team:
Miłwaukee Lethargy
My coach refused to follow my lineup. I had 9 players active, and all players had a spot on my depth chart. Yes, I used "Strictly Follow Depth Chart". And yes I used the "Load Former Match Tactics" option to verify my lineup after the game was over.

A player set at PF ended up playing 10 of 13 minutes at SG. While my coach brought back my starting center to play PF much of garbage time. As well as bringing back my Starting PF & starting SF parts of garbage time....

How does this even happen??? It was this game: (58718620)




Last edited by shikago at 3/21/2013 10:35:25 PM

From: shikago
This Post:
00
26712.744 in reply to 26712.743
Date: 3/21/2013 10:29:26 PM
Milwaukee Lethargy
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
Second Team:
Miłwaukee Lethargy
at the end of the 3rd quarter / all 4th quarter it should have been:

PG: A. Žibutis
SG: M. Toupeira
SF: T. Dozier
PF: J. Albano
C: T. Alas


Instead it was:

PG: A. Žibutis
SG: J. Albano
SF: T. Dozier
PF: A. Oliveros, P. Gutierrez, C. Ghiberti
C: T. Alas


All those players who came in at PF were starters with others behind them on the depth chart. And again, Albano was set to PF on the depth chart.

Last edited by shikago at 3/21/2013 10:31:36 PM

From: Ulkar

This Post:
00
26712.745 in reply to 26712.744
Date: 3/22/2013 12:56:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
235235
Same thing happened to be yesterday

I had 7 players playing
PG at starter backup reserve
SF at starter backup reserve
PF at starter backup reserve

SG had 1 backup and reserve (same guy)
C had 1 backup and reserve (same guy)

What happened is during garbage time, the backup SG got in for main SG, and then the main SG replaced my PG that was set for main backup and reserve. There was no foul trouble

Advertisement