BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Highest Experience

Highest Experience

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
173377.76 in reply to 173377.75
Date: 3/11/2011 1:55:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
The game should be equal for all and you don't deserve even more prizes.

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
This Post:
00
173377.77 in reply to 173377.76
Date: 3/11/2011 2:16:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
The game should be equal for all and you don't deserve even more prizes. :)


To your first statement, the game IS equal for all. The latter....nothing I can comment on that. Was hoping for some open discussion on the current experience system rather than and evaluation on who is more deserving of prizes.

This Post:
00
173377.78 in reply to 173377.77
Date: 3/11/2011 3:09:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
I don't think the bigger teams need to get bigger at a faster rate than others.

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
This Post:
00
173377.79 in reply to 173377.75
Date: 3/11/2011 3:14:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Again I agree with GM-CrazyEye. Shouldn't matter what league a guy is in. And playing more should give you more experience, not having properly managed minutes. As far as NT games go, i don't see why they should give such a big bonus.


Because an NBA superstar with 5 championship rings and has represented his country at the Olympics should rightfully have more experience than a Division 5 scrub that has played in his local league all his life?

In this sense, the experience system is flawed.

I would like to see extra experience awarded with winning the Tournament, or winning the division (Higher divisions offer bigger exp payout) and such. Tournament finals, Division playoff tiebreakers for the title, NT finals, all these offer a unique experience that the ordinary scrub will never obtain. And this way, the best players, playing at the top level and challenging for honors, will hold the best experience.


with the olympics we agree, but also games at low level could be close and tricky. Yes the player have weaker skills, but there are also amateur veterans - and it is also bad to the game design in my eyes if top teams get to much advanatages.

Experience wise, you should learn the most when you are a little big weaker then your opponents, so your olypic star would be bored and won't learn anything when he play in division five against players who can not stop him. Maybe the same happens with the 18 year old rookie, who plays top division against a player like him he would get more frustrated then learning the dirty tricks to beat his competion.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 3/11/2011 3:17:01 AM

This Post:
00
173377.80 in reply to 173377.75
Date: 3/11/2011 11:49:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
should rightfully have more experience than a Division 5 scrub that has played in his local league all his life?


Why?

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
From: Elmacca
This Post:
00
173377.81 in reply to 173377.80
Date: 3/11/2011 4:37:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
Players in the top teams get fractionally more xp because they generally play in the cup for longer.

XP is rumoured to be a significant factor in the last two minutes of close games - and in overtime. Generally, it's certainly better to have XP than not have it.

From: Egg-Man
This Post:
00
173377.83 in reply to 173377.82
Date: 3/16/2011 6:35:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Do players gain EX from NT games and B3? If they do, then better players CAN gain higher EX quicker.

From: Egg-Man

This Post:
00
173377.85 in reply to 173377.84
Date: 3/17/2011 6:08:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I know. I am just saying that there IS an advantage to better players and players on better teams because they have a higher chance of playing more.

Advertisement