BuzzerBeater Forums

BB België > Vreugdemuur

Vreugdemuur

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
6825.761 in reply to 6825.759
Date: 6/28/2010 3:56:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
471471
having U21 or NT players kinda 'forces' you to go all out. you must keep training them and that often results in a high salary.

so of them are less balanced too. and your team is a sort of 'SF squad' that ought to create some mismatches on some positions...

and the fact that you know how to play your tactics will help you aswell.

Rev

This Post:
00
6825.762 in reply to 6825.761
Date: 6/28/2010 10:27:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
yes, indeed. Maybe it's just 1 player in those teams then?

I'v always valued teamtraining and balance over 1 player-training.

Once I find a prospect to train I'll have to let go of my principals.


They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
6825.763 in reply to 6825.762
Date: 6/28/2010 11:25:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
471471
yes, indeed. Maybe it's just 1 player in those teams then?

I'v always valued teamtraining and balance over 1 player-training.

Once I find a prospect to train I'll have to let go of my principals. :)




i disagree. i think you'd prolly be the best SF trainer in BB... i'm having a shot at training one now. doing rather well, if i may say so myself ( he's been the first real SF on the U21 team for quite a while :D kinda feel honored that my work was appreciated so much)

since you loved balanced players so much( and you've got way more experience than i do) i'd expect you to train some top notch fella's...

Rev

ps: just be sure that the best one is a belgian player ;)

This Post:
00
6825.764 in reply to 6825.763
Date: 6/29/2010 8:29:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
hehe.
well, thinking about it.
Since I don't mind sacrificing everything for my 1 future star it indeed might be best to pick a SF for me, as I can easely let him play any position needed for optimal training... But I don't mind which position I get to train a player in, even a C will have to play PG once in a while to get some of his other skills ok too, same for a PG who'm I might play C for a few games to train his shot-blocking. (before Sum gets an attack, there MIGHT be 1 training I will never do, and that's blocking for guards, but it will be the only one indeed!! the guards will have to train inside defense, shot and rebounding for sure! )


They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
6825.765 in reply to 6825.764
Date: 6/29/2010 9:52:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
471471
hehe.
well, thinking about it.
Since I don't mind sacrificing everything for my 1 future star it indeed might be best to pick a SF for me, as I can easely let him play any position needed for optimal training... But I don't mind which position I get to train a player in, even a C will have to play PG once in a while to get some of his other skills ok too, same for a PG who'm I might play C for a few games to train his shot-blocking. (before Sum gets an attack, there MIGHT be 1 training I will never do, and that's blocking for guards, but it will be the only one indeed!! the guards will have to train inside defense, shot and rebounding for sure! )



off topic: someone call an ambulance. Sum will get the (heart)attack before he gets to read that he should have one

on topic:
i'm kinda sceptical to having rebounding on a PG. on an SF, it's logical, on a SG.... wel ok, you could come up with arguments to have a rebounding on your SG ( tho he'll look more like an SF then if you give him rebounding) but rebounding on a PG?

don't get me wrong, i like good secundairies on players, but i'd just wonder if it's worth to train IS on a PG that is still young... if you intend on doing that, i'd think you'd be better of taking a C who's got good inside, but of which his gaurd skills aren't to bad, and thus train him as a PG. then he'll have nice secundarie's. sur, it will take a bitt longer but the reward should be greater (and i think it will be faster than if you take a small Pg and train to force some inside pops out of him)

Rev

This Post:
00
6825.766 in reply to 6825.765
Date: 7/1/2010 12:13:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
ofcourse, it's prefereable to find a player with opposite skills. a very small guy who already has respectable inside skills would be perfect to train as a guard.

but indeed, finding the trainer will be hardest.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
6825.767 in reply to 6825.766
Date: 7/1/2010 4:56:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
471471
but indeed, finding the trainer will be hardest.


nah. their are a million trainers out thier. they ain't hard to find ;)

it's finding a good trainer, at a decent prize that takes patience :D and that isn't something you always have when you got a nice trainee ;)

This Post:
00
6825.768 in reply to 6825.767
Date: 7/2/2010 9:53:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
but I don't have a nice trainee yet either.

I saw a few that might be okay to train, even bid on 1 to make a C, but didn't have him.

Problem mostly is that I am offline at the end of the deadlines.

I saw 1 today I could make into a SF, but in the end decided not to bid yet.

Going to follow the market a few more days to see if there aren't better guys. Should I get a better trainer, I can bid quicker on prospects.

So far I only received 1 tip and it wasn't such a great guy to train. I've found better to start with on my own.

So maybe again a call towards Sum to let me know if prospects are TL-ed.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
6825.769 in reply to 6825.2
Date: 7/3/2010 3:49:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
let's all support Mod-Revo who currently is at the 3rd place in the World Cup Predictions. yeay!!!


They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
6825.770 in reply to 6825.769
Date: 7/3/2010 8:35:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
471471
hehe

make it 8th spot.

i had 2 - 1 to uruguay...

today, i'm expecting a high scoring game between Argentina and Germany :D

and the only reason i made that 3rd spot, is because i had 2 - 1 to the netherlands. madcap as i might be, i picked the netherlands as champs of this tourney. they got a team full of great players, tho some are dissapointing me (Van Persie, vdVaart, just to name a few)

so i'll be going with a netherland win in each of their games, regardless the opponent.

i must say, i felt sorry for Ghana yesterday...

i'll do my best and try and get the scores right for our tiny country ;)

Rev

This Post:
00
6825.771 in reply to 6825.770
Date: 7/3/2010 2:34:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
I gambled 1-1 for Netherlands, but I'd have said 5-4 after penalties
for the Netherlands

I also completely did wrong with my 3-1 for Argentina, indeed it was 4 goals, but just for the wrong team. ;)

but I know absolutely nothing from soccer, nor the teams or players participating, and still have 47 points, so it's quite ok

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
Advertisement